Palabras clave
confianza en las instituciones
inseguridades
movilización cognitiva
participación política
victimización
Categorías
Cómo citar
Resumen
La actualidad política en Brasil se caracteriza por una profunda contraposición entre propensión al autoritarismo y deseo de una sociedad más justa y democrática. La presente investigación examina las posibles causas de esta polarización poniendo a prueba un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales. Se ha planteado la hipótesis de que la participación en la vida pública depende de la reacción de la ciudadanía frente a las inseguridades públicas y privadas (criminalidad, miedo al delito y corrupción) que afectan a la sociedad brasileña. Los resultados indican que la confianza en las instituciones y la capacidad de movilización cognitiva son dos factores que moldean la relación entre las inseguridades y dos visiones inconciliables de participación política: una pasivo-agresiva y otra proactiva y protestataria.
Citas
Alaminos, Antonio y ClementePenalva. 2012. “The Cognitive Mobilization Index: Crises and Political Generations”. Sage Open 2 (1): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012440437
Alonso, Angela y AnnMische. 2016. “Changing Repertoires and Partisan Ambivalence in the New Brazilian Protests”. Bulletin of Latin American Research 36 (2): 144-159. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12470
Amnesty International. 2015. “Amnesty International Report 2014/15 – Brazil”. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, consultado el 13 de junio de 2019, https://www.refworld.org/docid/54f07e1214.html
Anderson, Christopher y YuliyaTverdova. 2003. “Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes toward Government in Contemporary Democracies”. American Journal of Political Science 47 (1): 91-109.
Anderson, Perry. 2016. “Crisis en Brasil”. En Golpe en Brasil. Genealogía de una farsa, editado por PabloGentili, 35-63. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
Armborst, Andreas. 2017. “How Fear of Crime Affects Punitive Attitudes”. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 23 (3): 461-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-017-9342-5
Avritzer, Leonardo. 2016. Impasses da democracia no Brasil. Río de Janeiro: Editora Civilização Brasileira.
Avritzer, Leonardo. 2017. “The Rousseff Impeachment and the Crisis of Democracy in Brazil”. Critical Policy Studies 11: 352-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2017.1363066
Baquero, Marcello. 2008. “Democracia formal, cultura política informal e capital social no Brasil”. Opinião Pública 14 (2): 380-413. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-62762008000200005
Baquero, Marcello. 2013. Qual a democracia para a América Latina? Capital social e empoderamento são a resposta?Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS.
Barros, Ricardo, Mirelade Carvalho, SamuelFranco y RosaneMendonça. 2010. “Markets, the State and the Dynamics of Inequality in Brazil”. En Declining Inequality in Latin America: A Decade of Progress?, editado por FelipeLópez-Calva y NoraLustig, 134-174. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
Bateson, Regina. 2012. “Crime Victimization and Political Participation”. American Political Science Review 106 (3): 570-587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000299
Bellows, John y MiguelEdward. 2006. “War and Institutions: New Evidence from Sierra Leone”. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 96 (2): 394-399.
Blanco, Luisa e IsabelRuiz. 2013. “The Impact of Crime and Insecurity on Trust in Democracy and Institutions”. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 103 (3): 284-288.
Blattman, Christopher. 2009. “From Violence to Voting: War and Political Participation in Uganda”. American Political Science Review 103 (2): 231-247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409090212
Borba, Julian, ÉderGimenes y EdnaldoRibeiro. 2015. “Bases sociais, atitudinais e comportamentais do apartidarismo brasileiro”. Revista Novos Estudos CEBRAP 101: 27-55. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-33002015000100002
Bratton, Michael. 2007. “Are You Being Served? Popular Satisfaction with Health and Education Services in Africa”. Afrobarometer, Working Paper No. 65. Michigan State University (MSU), Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA) y Centre for Democratic Development (CDD, Ghana). http://afrobarometer.org/publications/wp65-are-you-being-served-popular-satisfaction-health-and-education-services-africa
Braun, Daniela y SwenHutter. 2016. “Political Trust, Extra-representational Participation and the Openness of Political Systems”. International Political Science Review 37 (2): 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512114559108
Brooks, Sara. 2014. “Insecure Democracy: Risk and Political Participation in Brazil”. The Journal of Politics 76 (4): 972-985. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381614000553
Canache, Damarys y MichaelAllison. 2005. “Perceptions of Political Corruption in Latin American Democracies”. Latin American Politics and Society 47 (3): 91-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2005.tb00320.x
Carreras, Miguel. 2013. “The Impact of Criminal Violence on Regime Legitimacy in Latin America”. Latin American Research Review 48 (3): 85-107.
Catterberg, Gabriela y AlejandroMoreno. 2006. “The Individual Bases of Political Trust: Trends in New and Established Democracies”. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18 (1): 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh081
Ceobanu, Alin, CharlesWood y LudmilaRibeiro. 2011. “Crime Victimization and Public Support for Democracy: Evidence from Latin America”. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 23 (1): 56-78. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq040
Chagas-Bastos, Fabrício H.. 2019. “Political Realignment in Brazil: Jair Bolsonaro and the Right Turn”. Revista de Estudios Sociales 69: 92-100. https://doi.org/10.7440/res69.2019.08
Chang, Eric y Yun-hanChu. 2006. “Corruption and Trust: Exceptionalism in Asian Democracies?”. Journal of Politics 68 (2): 259-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00404.x
Conde, Maite y TariqJazeel. 2019. Manifesting Democracy? Urban Protests and the Politics of Representation in Brazil Post-2013. Londres: Wiley-Blackwell.
Corbacho, Ana, JuliaPhilipp y MauricioRuiz-Vega. 2012. Crime and Erosion of Trust. Evidence for Latin America. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank.
Corporación Latinobarómetro. 2018. “Informe 2018”. Corporación Latinobarómetro, consultado el 27 de septiembre de 2019, http://www.latinobarometro.org/latdocs/INFORME_2018_LATINOBAROMETRO.pdf
Dalton, Russell J. 1984. “Cognitive Mobilization and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies”. Journal of Politics 46: 264-284. https://doi.org/10.2307/2130444
Dalton, Russell J. 2012. The Apartisan American: Dealignment and Changing Electoral Politics. Washington: CQ Press.
Dammert, Lucia y Mary FranMalone. 2006. “Does It Take a Village? Policing Strategies and Fear of Crime in Latin America”. Latin American Politics and Society 48 (4): 27-51.
Deth, Jan W. van. 2001. “The Proof of the Pudding: Social Capital, Democracy, and Citizenship”. Ponencia presentada en la Conferencia EURESCO. Exeter, Reino Unido.
Dubrow, Joshua, KazimierzSlomczynski e IrinaTomescu-Dubrow. 2008. “Effects of Democracy and Inequality on Soft Political Protest in Europe”. International Journal of Sociology 38 (3): 36-51.
Evans, Mark y GerryStoker. 2016. “How Do Citizens Calibrate Their Relationship with Their Polity? The Contingent Nature of Political Engagement in Australia”. Australian Journal of Political Science 51 (2): 272-287.
Gavião, Leandro y AlexandreValadares. 2018. “Jair Bolsonaro: o candidato da (in)segurança pública”. Le Monde Diplomatique Brasil 11 (128): 12-13.
Germany, Jeff y Anthony W.Pereira. 2019. Understanding Contemporary Brazil. Londres y Nueva York: Routledge.
Hough, Mike, BenBradford, JonathanJackson y Julian R.Roberts. 2013. Attitudes to Sentencing and Trust in Justice: Exploring Trends from the Crime Survey for England and Wales. Londres: Ministry of Justice.
Howard, Marc y LeahGilbert. 2008. “A Cross-National Comparison of the Internal Effects of Participation in Voluntary Organizations”. Political Studies 56: 12-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00715.x
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University.
Kim, Harris Hyun-soo. 2014. “Generalised Trust, Institutional Trust and Political Participation. A Cross-National Study of Fourteen Southeast and Central Asian Countries”. Asian Journal of Social Science 42: 695-721.
Kingstone, Peter y TimothyPower. 2017. Democratic Brazil Divided. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Klesner, Joseph. 2007. “Social Capital and Political Participation in Latin America: Evidence from Argentina, Chile, Mexico, and Peru”. Latin American Research Review 42 (2): 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2007.0022
Layton, Matthew. 2014. “El Mundial de Fútbol y las protestas: ¿Qué aqueja a Brasil?”. Perspectivas desde el Barómetro de las Américas: 2014, No. 106. Vanderbilt University: Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP). https://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/insights/IO906es.pdf
Mendonça, Ricardo y SelenErcan. 2015. “Deliberation and Protest: Strange Bedfellows? Revealing the Deliberative Potential of 2013 Protests in Turkey and Brazil”. Political Studies 3 (3): 267-282.
Mishler, William y RichardRose. 2001. “What Are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies”. Comparative Political Studies 34 (1): 30-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034001002
Montero, Alfred P. 2014. Brazil: Reversal of Fortune. Malden: Polity Press.
Morrison, Kevin y MarcRockmore. 2016. “Fear and Political Participation: Evidence from Africa”. HiCN, Working Paper 226. Households in Conflict Network. https://ideas.repec.org/p/hic/wpaper/226.html
Moseley, Mason y MatthewLayton. 2013. “Prosperity and Protest in Brazil: The Wave of the Future for Latin America?” AmericasBarometer Insights: 2013, No. 93. Vanderbilt University: Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP). https://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/insights/IO893en.pdf
Muthén, Linda K. y Bengt O.Muthén2012. Mplus User’s Guide. Los Ángeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Citizens. Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nyćkowiak, Justyna. 2009. “Political Activity. Is Trust in Democratic Institutions Really a Relevant Determinant?”. International Journal of Sociology 39: 49-61.
Obydenkova, Anastassia y BrunoArpino. 2018. “Corruption and Trust in the European Union and National Institutions: Changes over the Great Recession across European States”. Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (3): 594-611. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12646
Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito (UNODC). 2017. “Global Study on Homicide”, consultado el 3 de enero de 2020, https://dataunodc.un.org/GSH_app
Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito (UNODC). 2015. Study on Firearms. A Study on the Transnational Nature of and Routes and Modus Operandi Used in Trafficking in Firearms. Viena: Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito.
Pereira, Antony. 2016. “Is the Brazilian State Patrimonial?”. Latin American Perspectives 43 (2): 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X15616119
Perlman, Janice. 2006. “The Metamorphosis of Marginality: Four Generations in the Favelas of Rio de Janeiro”. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 606 (1): 154-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716206288826
Russo, Guilherme. 2016. “En medio de la crisis en Brasil, el respeto por las instituciones políticas es bajo y se encuentra en descenso”. Barómetro de las Américas: Actualidad. Vanderbilt University: Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP). https://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/insights/ITB025es.pdf
Saad-Filho, Alfred. 2013. “Mass Protests under Left Neoliberalism: Brazil, June-July 2013”. Critical Sociology 39 (5): 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513501906
Seligson, Mitchell A. 2002. “The Impact of Corruption on Regime Legitimacy: A Comparative Study of Four Latin American Countries”. Journal of Politics 64 (2): 408-433.
Sério de Lima, Renato, James FerreiraMouraJunior, PauloJannuzzi, SamiraBueno, CauêMartins, MarinaPinheiro, IsabelaSobral, RobertaAstolfi, DavidMarques, OlayaHanashiro y CristinaNeme. 2017. Medo da Violência e o Apoio ao Autoritarismo no Brasil. Índice de Propensão ao apoio a Posições Autoritárias. São Paulo: Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública.
The World Bank Group. 2016. Taking on Inequality. Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2016. Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
The World Bank Group. 2017. “Intentional Homicides (per 100,000 people)”. The World Bank Group, consultado el 10 de noviembre de 2019, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/VC.IHR.PSRC.P5?most_recent_value_desc=true
Torney-Purta, Judith, CarolynBarber y WendyRichardson. 2004. “Trust in Government-related Institutions and Political Engagement among Adolescents in Six Countries”. Acta Politica 39 (4): 380-406. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500080
Vélez-Rodríguez, Ricardo. 2015. A grande mentira: Lula e o patrimonialismo petista. Campinas: Vide Editorial.
Villoria, Manuel, GreggVan Ryzin y CeciliaLavena. 2012. “Social and Political Consequences of Administrative Corruption: A Study of Public Perceptions in Spain”. Public Administration Review 73 (1): 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02613.x
Voors, Maarten, EleonoraNillesen, PhilipVerwimp, Erwin H.Bulte, RobertLensink y Daan P. VanSoest. 2012. “Violent Conflict and Behavior: A Field Experiment in Burundi”. American Economic Review 102 (2): 941-964.
Winters, Matthew S. y RebeccaWeitz-Shapiro. 2014. “Partisan Protesters and Nonpartisan Protests in Brazil”. Journal of Politics in Latin America 6 (1): 137-150.
Zaluar, Alba. 2007. “Unfinished Democratization: The Failure of Public Safety”. Estudos Avançados 21 (61): 31-49.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.