Diseño de unidades curriculares para mejorar la expresión oral: una experiencia pedagógica con estudiantes de secundaria
No. 2 (2017-12-01)Autor/a(es/as)
-
Nancy María Torres Cepeda1Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Tunja, Colombia (nancymaria.torres@uptc.edu.co)
Resumen
Este artículo presenta un informe sobre una investigación e intervención pedagógica llevada a cabo con un grupo de estudiantes de noveno grado en su clase de Inglés como Lengua Extranjera en Tunja, Colombia. El objetivo principal de esta investigación fue mejorar las habilidades de expresión oral a través del diseño e implementación de unidades curriculares contextualizadas. Después de implementar las unidades curriculares, los datos se recopilaron mediante notas de campo, encuestas y entrevistas estructuradas. Los hallazgos de la experiencia pedagógica revelaron que los estudiantes mejoraron sus habilidades para hablar mediante la expresión de experiencias personales vividas en Boyacá. Ellos incrementaron su léxico, mejoraron su pronunciación y desarrollaron confianza a medida que identificaban y encontraban una conexión personal con las unidades curriculares contextualizadas, encontrando oportunidades para hablar sobre sus intereses, emociones y sentimientos.
Referencias
Ariza, A. (2004). Curricular units: Powerful tools to connect the syllabus with students’ needs and interests. PROFILE, 5(1) 140-157
Ariza, A., & Viáfara, J. (2008). Independent work material design principles: Main implications from a research project on peer tutoring in the Modern Languages Program at UPTC. Proceedings from 43rd ASOCOPI Annual Conference on ELT Materials: Possibilities and Challenges for the Classroom. Tunja, Colombia.
Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Bruton, A. (1997). In what ways do we want EFL course books to differ? System, 25(2), 275-284.
Byagte, M. (1987). Speaking. Teaching to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cárdenas,R., & Cháves, O. (2013). English teaching in Cali: teachers’ proficiency level described. Lenguaje, 41 (2), 325-352.
Celce-Murica, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. New York, NY: Heinle Cengage Learning.
Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson.
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S., (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Díaz, J. (2011). Use of Video as a didactic resource to improve listening and speaking in fourth graders. Unpublished Monograph, Tunja: UPTC.
Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (1986). Information-gap tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 20, 305-326.
Gámez, N. & González, I. (2013). Exploring my home culture through curricular units: a tool to contextualize my English learning. (Unpublished Monograph). Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Tunja.
Harmer, J. (1998). How to teach English. Harlow, Essex: Addison Wesley Longman.
Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. New York: Longman.
Harmer, J. (2012). Essential teacher knowledge: Core concepts in English language teaching. London, UK: Pearson Education.
Harwood, N. (2010). English Language Teaching Materials: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, C. (2004). Language output, communication strategies and communicative tasks. University Press of America.
Lightbrown, P. & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learnt. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge: CUP.
Madrid, D. (2000). Observation and research in the classroom: In teaching English as a foreign language. Barcelona: The Australian Institute.
Nieto, S. (2013). Finding joy in teaching students of diverse backgrounds. United States: Heinemann.
Nunan, D. (1999). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Núñez, A., & Téllez, M., (2008). ELT materials design: The key to fostering effective teaching and learning settings. Proceedings from 43rd ASOCOPI Annual Conference on ELT Materials: Possibilities and Challenges for the Classroom. Tunja, Colombia.
Núñez, A., & Téllez, M., (2009). ELT materials: The key to fostering effective teaching and learning settings. PROFILE, 11(2), 172-178.
Oxford, R.L. (1999). Anxiety in the language learner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ramos, B., Aguirre, J., & Hernández, C. (2012). A pedagogical experience to delve into students´ sense of cultural belonging and intercultural understanding in a rural school. HOW, A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English, 19 (2), 123-145.
Ramos Holguín, B., & Aguirre Morales, J. (2014). Materials development in the Colombian context: Some considerations about its benefits and challenges. HOW, A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English, 21(2), 134-150.
Ramos, B., Aguirre, J. & Torres, N. (2017). Enhancing EFL speaking in rural settings: Challenges and opportunities for material developers. Tunja, Boyacá: Unidad Editorial Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia.
Tomlinson, B. (1998). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomlinson, B. (2003). Developing materials for language teaching. London: Continuum.
Tomlinson, B. (Ed). (2011). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Torres, N. (2017). Student-teachers’ identities construction as future EFL teachers. (Unpublished Master´s thesis). Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Tunja.
Urquhart, C. (2013). Grounded theory for qualitative research: Practical guide. London: Sage.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.