Abordagens ecológicas ao clima escolar em Bogotá: perfis de risco, desempenho escolar e ambientes escolares
No. 1 (2023-12-11)Autor(es)
-
Gary CifuentesUniversidad de los Andes
-
María Lucía Guerrero Farías
-
Andrea Del Pilar Solano Vargas
Resumo
Este documento é construído com base nos resultados de uma pesquisa realizada na Universidade dos Andes entre 2021 e 2022, que analisou como a universidade responde curricularmente às mudanças que estão ocorrendo nas profissões. O que o leitor encontrará são nove aspectos críticos que se revelam ser dimensões-chave ao pensar nos processos de inovação curricular. Esses pontos críticos são apresentados como um conjunto de riscos na medida em que as reformas curriculares são vistas como uma tarefa essencialmente técnica voltada exclusivamente para a prestação de contas, sem qualquer forma de reflexão institucional. Portanto, para cada ponto crítico associado, é proposta uma recomendação que visa compreender como diferentes aspectos da inovação curricular devem ser abordados.
Referências
Abelha, M., Fernandes, S., Mesquita, D., Seabra, F. & Ferreira-Oliveira, A. T. (2020). Graduate employability and competence development in higher education—A systematic literature review using PRISMA. Sustainability, 12 (15), 5900. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12155900
Annala, J. & Mäkinen, M. (2013). Curriculum as intentional and dynamic process in higher education. Paper presented at the European Conference on Curriculum Studies. Future Direction: Uncertainty and Possibility. Braga, Portugal, October. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274337069_Curriculum_as_intentional_and_dynamic_process_in_higer_education
Annala, J. Lindén, J. & Mäkinen, M. (2016). Curriculum in higher education research. En J. Case & J. Huisman (eds.), Researching Higher Education. International perspectives on theory, policy and practice (pp.171–189). Londres: SHRE Society for Research into Higher Education & Routledge.
Brown, S. (2013). Change management in higher education: An empirical approach. En L. Morris y C. Tsolakidis (eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Education (pp. 89-98). Crete, Greece: Southampton SOLENT University and JIBC.
Cifuentes G., Guerrero Faría M. L. y Solano A. (2023). Promoviendo la excelencia del profesorado: visión, direccionamiento y trayectoria del Centro de Enseñanza y Aprendizaje (CEyA) de la Universidad de los Andes. Inspiración, acción, transformación. ¿Cómo funcionan los centros de desarrollo pedagógico en Colombia? (ISBN 978-958-789-471-4) pp. 169-190. Universidad del Norte.
Cummings, R., Phillips, R., Tilbrook, R. & Lowe, K. (2005). Middle-out approaches to reform of university teaching and learning: Champions striding between the top-down and bottom-up approaches. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 6 (1), 1-18.
Díaz, M. (Ed.) (2017). Problemas del campo curricular en América Latina. Una aproximación comparativa. Cali: Universidad Santiago de Cali.
Henderikx, P. & Jansen, D. (2018). The changing pedagogical landscape: In search of patterns in policies and practices of new modes of teaching and learning. https://tinyurl.com/CPLreport2018
Honkimäki, S., Jääskelä, P., Kratochvil, J. & Tynjälä, P. (2022). University-wide, top-down curriculum reform at a Finnish university: Perceptions of the academic staff. European Journal of Higher Education, 12 (2), 153-170.
Khan, M. & Law, L. (2015). An integrative approach to curriculum development in higher education in the USA: A theoretical framework. International Education Studies, 8 (3), 66-76.
López, L. & Juanes, B. (2020). Flexibilidad curricular en la formación del profesional. Universidad y Sociedad, 12 (1), 194-201.
Oliver, S. & Hyun, E. (2011). Comprehensive curriculum reform in higher education: Collaborative engagement of faculty and administrators. Journal of Case Studies in Education, 2, 1-20.
Patria, B. (2012). Change management in the higher education context: A case of student-centred learning implementation. International Journal of Education, 4 (4), 176-191.
Pegg, A. (2013). We think that’s the future: Curriculum reform initiatives in higher education. Higher Education Academy. Centre for Inclusion and Collaborative Partnerships, Open University. https//www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/curriculum_reform_final_19th_dec_1.pdf.
Posner, G. J. (2005). Análisis del currículo. Toronto: McGraw-Hill.
Rivas, M. (2000). Innovación educativa. Teoría, procesos y estrategias. Madrid: Síntesis.
Shams, F. (2019). Managing academic identity tensions in a Canadian public university: The role of identity work in coping with managerialism. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41 (6), 619-632.
Singh, P., Thomas, S. & Harris, J. (2013). Recontextualising policy discourses: A Bernsteinian perspective on policy interpretation, translation, enactment. Journal of Education Policy, 28 (4), 465-480. Doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.770554
Snyder, J., Bolin, F. & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. En P. Jackson (ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 402-435). Nueva York: Macmillan.
Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Ángeles: SAGE.