Prisons as spaces of exclusion or reconciliation
No. 18 (2016-01-01)Author(s)
-
Libardo José Ariza
-
Manuel Iturralde
Abstract
This article discusses how the aims and the social functions of prisons are reflected in their architectural designs. These are not simply economic organizations of space that host relevant activities; they also communicate important political, social, and cultural meanings about crime and punishment. The article also analyzes the roles that prison plays and can play in terms of the constructions of meaning and spaces that can promote or obstruct the social reconciliation that should supposedly be part of post-conflict.
References
Ariza, Libardo. “Reformando el infierno: los tribunales y la transformación del campo penitenciario en Latinoamérica”. Los muros de la infamia: prisiones en Colombia y América Latina, editado por Libardo Ariza y Manuel Iturralde, 19-109. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes, 2011.
Ariza, Libardoy ManuelIturralde. “Castigo penitenciario y transición: elementos para la interpretación de la experiencia colombiana”. En Perspectivas jurídicas para la paz, 399-426. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes, 2016.
Beijersbergen, Karin A., AnjaJ. E. Dirkzwager, PeterH. van derLaan yPaul Nieuwbeerta. “A Social Building?: Prison Architecture and Staff-Prisoner Relationships”. Crime & Delinquency (2014): 1-32. doi: 10.1177/0011128714530657
Dale, Kareny GibsonBurrell.The Spaces of Organization & the Organization of Space: Power & Materiality at Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2008.
Dhami, Mandeep K., Greg Mantley Darrell Fox. “Restorative Justice in Prisons”. Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice 12, n.º 4 (2009): 433-448. doi: 10.1080/10282580903343027
Foucault, Michel.Vigilar y castigar: nacimiento de la prisión. México: Siglo XXI, 1976.
Gavrielides, Theo. “Reconciling the Notions of Restorative Justice and Imprisonment”. The Prison Journal 94, n.º 4 (2014): 479-505.
Guidoni, Odillo Vidoni. “The Ambivalences of Restorative Justice: Some Reflections on an Italian Prison Project”. Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice 6 n.º 1 (2003): 55-68. doi: 10.1080/1028258032000055658
Hancock, Philip e Yvonne Jewkes. “Architectures of Incarceration: The Spatial Pains of Imprisonment”. Punishment & Society 13, n.º 5 (2011): 611-629.
Hillier, Bill.Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Larson, Doran. “Why Scandinavian Prisons Are Superior”. The Atlantic, 24 de septiembre de 2013. http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/09/why-scandinavian-prisons-are-superior/279949/
Lovell, Madeline, Jacqueline Helfgott, Charles Lawrence. “Narrative Accounts from the Citizens, Victims, and Offenders Restoring Justice Program”. Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice 5, n.º 3 (2002): 261-272.
Oficina del Alto Comisionado de Derechos Humanos. Justicia transicional y derechos económicos, sociales y culturales, 2014.http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/HR-PUB-13-05_sp.pdf
Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito. Manual sobre programas de justicia restaurativa, 2006.https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/Manual_sobre_programas_de_justicia_restaurativa.pdf
Piacentini, Lauray GavinSlade. “Architecture and Attachment: Carceral Collectivism and the Problem of Prison Reform in Russia and Georgia. Theoretical Criminology 19, n.º 2 (2015): 179-197. doi: 10.1080/10282580213088