Revista de Estudios Sociales

rev. estud. soc. | eISSN 1900-5180 | ISSN 0123-885X

Tipos de identificación partidaria. América Latina en perspectiva comparada, 2004-2012

No. 57 (2016-07-01)
  • Mauricio Morales Quiroga
    Universidad Diego Portales, Chile

Resumen

Se analiza la identificación con partidos en América Latina en dos dimensiones: volumen y composición. En general, la literatura se concentra en el análisis del volumen, medido como el porcentaje de ciudadanos identificados con algún partido. Sin embargo, dos países con idéntico volumen de identificación no necesariamente comparten idénticos contextos institucionales o sistemas de partidos. La identificación puede reproducirse en distintos ambientes. Incluso, puede cultivarse en sistemas de partidos inestables y escasamente programáticos, lo que lleva a pensar en la existencia de distintos tipos de identificación. Acá se proponen dos: la identificación por convicción y la identificación por transacción. Para mostrar el predominio de cada tipo de identificación utilizo la serie de resultados de Latinobarómetro (1995-2003) y LAPOP (2006-2012), diseñando modelos logísticos multinomiales por país.

Palabras clave: América Latina, partidos políticos (Thesaurus), identificación partidaria (palabra clave de autor)

Referencias

Abente, Diego.2009. “Paraguay: The Unraveling of One-Party Rule”. Journal of Democracy20 (1): 143-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0056

AbramowitzAlan I. y Kyle L.Saunders. 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the US Electorate”. Journal of Politics60(3): 634-652.

Abramson, Paul R.1983. Political Attitudes in America. Formation and Change.San Francisco: Freeman and Company.

Abramson, Paul R. y Charles W.Ostrom. 1994. “Question Form and Context Effects in the Measurement of Partisanship: Experimental Tests of the Artifact Hypothesis”.American Political Science Review88 (4): 955-958. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2082718

Adams, James.2001. Party Competition and Responsible Party Government: A Theory of Spatial Competition Based upon Insights from Behavioral Voting Research.Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Aguilar, Jesús.2008. “Identificación partidaria: apuntes teóricos para su estudio”. POLIS4 (2): 15-46.

Barnes, Samuel H., M. KentJennings, RonaldInglehart y BarbaraFarah.1988. “Party Identification and Party Closeness in Comparative Perspective”. Political Behavior10 (83): 215-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00990552

Benton, Lucinda.2005. “Dissatisfied Democrats or Retrospective Voters? Economic Hardship, Political Institutions, and Voting Behavior in Latin America”. Comparative Political Studies38 (4): 417-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414004273856

Campbell, Angus,Philip Converse, WarrenMiller y DonaldStokes.1960. The American Voter.Nueva York: John Wiley.

Converse, Philip.1969. “Of Time and Partisan Stability”. Comparative Political Studies2 (2): 139-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001041406900200201

Converse, Philip y RoyPierce.1985. “Measuring Partisanship”. Political Methodology11 (3/4): 143-166.

Crewe, Ivor.1995. “Voters, Parties and Leaders Thirty Years on: Western Electoral Studies and the New Democracies of Eastern Europe”. En Developing Democracy, editado por IanBudge y DavidMcKay, 3-78. Londres: Sage Publications.

Dalton, Russell J.1999. “Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies”. En Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic Governance, editado por PippaNorris, 57-77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dalton, Russell J.2000. “Citizen Attitudes and Political Behavior”. Comparative Political Studies 33 (6/7): 912-940. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001041400003300609

Dalton, Russell J. y StevenWeldon. 2007. “Partisanship and Party System Institutionalization”. Party Politics13 (2): 179-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354068807073856

Fiorina, Morris P.1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections.Nueva Haven – Londres: Yale University Press.

Fiorina, Morris P.1992. Divided Government.Nueva York: Macmillan.

Grofman, Bernard N.1995. Information, Participation and Choice. An Economic Theory of Democracy in Perspective.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Harrop, Martin y WilliamMiller. 1987. Elections and Voters: A Comparative Introduction.Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Holmberg, Sören.2007. “Partisanship Reconsidered”. En The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, editado por RussellDalton y Hans D.Klingemann, 557-570. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0029

Green, Donald, BradleyPalmquist y EricSchickler.2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. Nueva Haven: Yale University Press.

Jennings, Kent y RichardNiemi.1968. “The Transmission of Political Values from Parent to Child”. American Political Science Review62 (1): 169-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1953332

Johnston, Richard.2006. “Party Identification: Unmoved Mover or Sum of Preferences?”. Annual Review of Political Science9 (1): 329-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170523

Kiewiet, Roderick.1981. “Policy-Oriented Voting in Response to Economic Issues”. American Political Science Review75 (2): 448-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1961377

Kiewiet, Roderick y DouglasRivers.1984. “A Prospective on Retrospective Voting”. Political Behavior6 (4): 369-393.

Kinder, Donald y RoderickKiewiet.1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case”. British Journal of Political Science11 (2): 129-161.

Kitschelt, Herbert, Kirk A.Hawkins, Juan PabloLuna, GuillermoRosas y ElizabethJ. Zechmeister, eds. 2010. Latin American Party Systems.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kramer, Gerald H.1971. “Short Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896-1964”. American Political Science Review65 (1): 131-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1955049

Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP). 2008. El Barómetro de las Américas por el Proyecto de Opinión Pública de América Latina. Nashville. www.LapopSurveys.org

Lazarsfeld, Paul, BernardBerelson y HazelGaudet.1944. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign.Nueva York: Columbia University Press.

Levine, Daniel y JoséMolina.2007. “La calidad de la democracia en América Latina: una visión comparada”. América Latina Hoy45: 17-46.

Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies.Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.

Lewis-Beck, Michael y MaryStegmaier. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes”. Annual Review of Political Science3: 183-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.183

Lipset, Seymour M. y SteinRokkan. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments. Introduction”. En Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-25 National Perspectives, editado por Seymour M.Lipset y SteinRokkan, 1-64. Nueva York: The Free Press.

López, Miguel Ángel.2004. “Conducta electoral y estratos económicos: el voto de los sectores populares en Chile”. Política43: 285-298.

Luna, JuanPablo y DavidAltman.2011. “Uprooted but Stable: Chilean Parties and the Concept of Party System Institutionalization”. Latin American Politics and Society53 (2): 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00115.x

Lupu, Noam.2014. “Brand Dilution and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin American”. World Politics66 (4): 561-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0043887114000197

Lupu, Noam y SusanStokes.2010.“Democracy, Interrupted: Regime Change and Partisanship in Twentieth-Century Argentina”. Electoral Studies 29 (1): 91-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2009.07.005

MacKuen, Michael B., Robert S.Erikson y JamesStimson. 1989. “Macropartisanship”. American Political Science Review83 (4): 1125-1142.

MacKuen, Michael B., Robert S.Erikson y JamesStimson. 1992. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy”. American Political Science Review86 (3): 597-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1964124

Mainwaring, Scott.1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil.Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Mainwaring, Scott y TimothyScully.1995. Building Democratic Institutions. Party System in Latin America.Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Mainwaring, Scott y MarianoTorcal. 2005. “La institucionalización de los sistemas de partidos y la teoría del sistema partidista después de la tercera ola democratizadora”. América Latina Hoy41: 141-173.

Mainwaring, Scott, Ana MaríaBejarano y EduardoPizarro Leongómez. 2006. The Crisis of Democratic Representation in the Andes.Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Mainwaring, Scott y EdurneZoco.2007. “Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition: Electoral Volatility in Old and New Democracies”. Party Politics13 (2): 155-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354068807073852

Mercado, Lauro.1997. “Una visita a la lealtad hacia los partidos políticos en América Latina”. Política y Gobierno4 (2): 285-346.

Miller, Warren y MerrillShanks.1996. The New American Voter.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Morales, Mauricio.2011. “Identificación partidaria y crisis de representación. América Latina en perspectiva comparada”. Revista de Ciencias SocialesXVII (4): 583-597.

Morales, Mauricio.2014. “Identificación partidaria en América Latina. Instituciones, historia y votantes”, disertación doctoral, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

Moreno, Alejandro y PatriciaMéndez.2006. “La identificación partidista en las elecciones presidenciales de 2000 y 2006 en México”. Política y GobiernoXIV (1): 43-75.

Morgan, Jana.2007. “Partisanship during the Collapse of Venezuela’s Party System”. Latin American Research Review42 (1): 78-98.

Nannestad, Peter y MartinPaldman.1994. “The VP-function: A Survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions after 25 Years”. Public Choice79 (3/4): 213-245.

Payne, Mark,Daniel Zovatto, FernandoCarrillo y AndrésAllamand.2003. La política importa. Democracia y desarrollo en América Latina.Washington: BID.

Popkin, Samuel L.1995. “Information Shortcuts and the Reasoning Voter”. En Information, Participation and Choice: An Economic Theory of Democracy in Perspective, editado por BernardGrofman, 17-35. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Richardson, Laurel.1991. “Postmodern Social Theory: Representational Practices”.Sociological Theory9 (2): 173-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/202078

Roberts, Kenneth M. y ErikWibbels. 1999. “Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations”. American Political Science Review93 (3): 575-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2585575

Selios, Lucía.2006. “Los últimos diez años de la cultura política uruguaya: entre la participación y el desencanto”. América Latina Hoy44: 63-85.

Stokes, Susan.2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Cott, Donna Lee.2005. From Movements to Parties in Latin America. The Evolution of Ethnic Politics.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ventura, Raphael.1991. “Family Political Socialization in Multiparty Systems”. Comparative Political Studies34 (6): 666-691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034006004

Walden, Graham, comp. 2002. Survey Research Methodology, 1990-1999. Bibliographies and Indexes in Law and Political Science.Westport: Greenwood Press.

Zechmeister, Elizabeth.2010. “Left-Right Semantics as a Facilitator of Programmatic Structuration”. En Latin American Party Systems, editado por HerbertKitschelt, KirkA. Hawkins, JuanPablo Luna, GuillermoRosas y Elizabeth J.Zechmeister, 96-118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Licencia

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.