Conocimiento técnico y transición energética en el Cono Sur: un enfoque sociológico
No. 72 (2020-04-01)Autor/a(es/as)
-
Cristián Parker G.Universidad de Santiago de Chile
Resumen
La investigación social sobre la transición hacia las energías renovables se ha enfocado en conocer las políticas públicas y los movimientos sociales relacionados. El conocimiento energético tiene un importante papel práctico, normativo y social que influye en la manera en que los actores asumen esta transición, lo que ha sido escasamente estudiado a nivel de localidades o comunas, y aún menos en el Sur Global. A través de una metodología comparativa, se estudian casos de comunas en Argentina y Chile. La presentación de los resultados utiliza una variedad de fuentes de datos para explorar los enmarques de la matriz energética y de los proyectos energéticos, y así revela el papel del conocimiento técnico en la construcción de la agencia local. Este artículo presenta una discusión teórica y conclusiones que incluyen propuestas para el desarrollo futuro de un proceso de transición más local, inclusivo, comprometido y deliberativo, que se basa en la experiencia técnica local en energías renovables.
Referencias
Agostini, Claudio, CarlosSilva, and ShahriyarNasirov. 2017. “Failure of Energy Mega-Projects in Chile: A Critical Review from Sustainability Perspectives.” Sustainability 9 (6): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061073
Ahlborg, Helene. 2017. “Towards a Conceptualization of Power in Energy Transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 25: 122-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.004
Baigorrotegui, Gloria. 2019. “Destabilization of Energy Regime and Liminal Transition through Collective Action in Chile.” Energy Research & Social Science 55: 198-207.
Baigorrotegui, Gloria and CristiánParker, eds. 2018. ¿Conectar o desconectar? Comunidades energéticas y transiciones hacia la sustentabilidad.Santiago: Editorial Estudios Avanzados; IDEA; USACH.
Bajoit, Guy. 2015. La maison du sociologue. Pour une théorie sociologique générale.Louvain-la-Neuve: Editions Academia-L’Harmattan.
Baker, Reg, J. MichaelBrick, Nancy A.Bates, MikeBattaglia, Mick P.Couper, Jill A.Dever, Krista J.Gile, and RogerTourangeau. 2013. “Summary Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-probability Sampling”. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 1 (2): 90-143. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smt008
Benford, Robert D. and David A.Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 611-639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
Berger, Peter L. and ThomasLuckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City: Doubleday.
Berkhout, Frans, PeterMarcotullio, and TatsuyaHanaoka. 2012. “Understanding Energy Transitions.” Sustainability Science 7 (2): 109-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0173-5
Catney, Philip, SherilynMacGregor, AndrewDobson, Sarah MarieHall, SarahRoyston, ZoeRobinson, MarkOrmerod, and SimonRoss. 2014. “Big Society, Little Justice? Community Renewable Energy and the Politics of Localism.” Local Environment 19 (7): 715-730. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.792044
Cherp, Aleh, VadimVinichenko, JessicaJewell, ElinaBrutschin, and BenjaminSovacool. 2018. “Integrating Techno-Economic, Socio-Technical and Political Perspectives on National Energy Transitions: A Meta-Theoretical Framework.” Energy Research and Social Science 37: 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.015
Ciapuscio, Héctor. 1996. “El Conocimiento Tecnológico.” Redes 3 (6): 177-194.
Cowell, Richard, GillBristow, and MaxMunday. 2011. “Acceptance, Acceptability and Environmental Justice: The Role of Community Benefits in Wind Energy Development.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54 (4): 539-557. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.521047
Del Canto, Ero and AliciaSilva. 2013. “Metodología cuantitativa: abordaje desde la complementariedad en Ciencias Sociales.” Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Cr) 3 (141): 25-34.
Deng, Jing, Gordon J.Walker, and GuySwinnerton. 2006. “A Comparison of Environmental Values and Attitudes between Chinese in Canada and Anglo-Canadians.” Environment and Behavior 38 (1): 22-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505278458
Devine-Wright, Patrick. 2005. “Local Aspects of UK Renewable Energy Development: Exploring Public Beliefs and Policy Implications.” Local Environment 10 (1): 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354983042000309315
Dirección de Estudios Sociales del Instituto de Sociología de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (DESUC). 2018. “Informe final: ‘Encuesta Nacional de Medio Ambiente 2018’”. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente de Chile, accessed May 14, 2019, https://mma.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Informe-Final-Encuesta-Nacional-de-Medio-Ambiente-2018.pdf
Dunlap, Riley E. and AngelaMertig. 1997. “Global Environmental Concern: An Anomaly for Postmaterialism.” Social Science Quarterly 78: 24-29.
Dunlap, Riley E. and RichardYork. 2008. “The Globalization of Environmental Concern and The Limits of The Postmaterialist Values Explanation: Evidence from Four Multinational Surveys.” The Sociological Quarterly 49 (3): 529-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2008.00127.x
EY Power & Utilities. 2017. “Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index-RECAI. The Retail Energy Revolution.” EY Power & Utilities, accessed May 14, 2019, https://www.ey.com/publication/vwluassets/ey-recai-issue-50-october-2017/$file/ey-recai-issue-50-october-2017.pdf
EY Power & Utilities. 2019. “RECAI Issue 53: Index Scores.” EY Power & Utilities, accessed May 14, 2019, https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/es_mx/topics/power-and-utilities/ey-recai-index-53-scores-ladder.pdf
Fairchild, Denise and AlWeinrub. 2017. Energy Democracy. Advancing Equity in Clean Energy Solutions. Washington: Island Press; Center for Resource Economics.
FGV Energía.2016. Un análisis comparativo de la transición energética en América Latina y Europa. Lima: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
Froestad, Jan and CliffordShearing. 2017. “Energy and the Anthropocene: Security Challenges and Solutions.” Crime, Law and Social Change 68 (5): 515-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9700-8
Fuchs, Christian, WolfgangHofkirchner, and BertKlauninger. 2002. “The Dialectic of Bottom-up and Top-down Emergence in Social Systems.” INTAS Project “Human Strategies in Complexity”, Research Paper No. 8. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=385300
Fuchs, Gerhard and NeleHinderer. 2016. “Towards a Low Carbon Future: A Phenomenology of Local Electricity Experiments in Germany.” Journal of Cleaner Production 128: 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.078
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hernando, Maite and GustavoBlanco. 2016. “Territorio y energías renovables no convencionales.” Gestión y Políticia Pública 25 (1): 165-202.
International Energy Agency (IEA). 2017. Renewables 2017. Analysis and Forecasts to 2022. Paris: OECD; IEA.
Kidd, Natalia. 2017. “Crece el rechazo ciudadano a proyecto de planta nuclear en la Patagonia argentina.” EFE, July 30, https://www.efe.com/efe/cono-sur/cronicas/crece-el-rechazo-ciudadanoa-proyecto-de-planta-nuclear-em-la-patagoniaargentina/50000803-3339523
“La energía nuclear acercó al país a la OCDE.” 2017. El Economista, May 22, http://www.eleconomista.com.ar/2017-05-la-energia-nuclear-acerco-al-pais-la-ocde/
Latinobarómetro. 2017. Informe 2017. Buenos Aires: Corporación Latinobarómetro.
Leff, Enrique. 2000. “Espacio, lugar y tiempo: la reapropiación social de la naturaleza y la construcción local de la racionalidad ambiental.” Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente 1: 57-69. https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v1i0.3057
Leiserowitz, Anthony A., Robert W.Kates, and Thomas M.Parris. 2006. “Sustainability Values, Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Review of Multinational and Global Trends.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31 (1): 413-44. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.102505.133552
Marshall, Martin N. 1996. “Sampling for Qualitative Research.” Family Practice 13 (6): 522-526. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
Martínez Alier, Joan. 2009. El ecologismo de los pobres. Conflictos ambientales y lenguajes de valoración. Barcelona: Editorial Icaria.
Mendoza, Emma and VadimPérez. 2010. “Energías renovables y movimientos sociales en América Latina.” Estudios Internacionales 43 (165): 109-128.
Miroff, Nick. 2017. “‘A Solar Saudi Arabia’ While Trump Promotes Coal, Chile and Others Are Turning to Cheap Sun Power.” The Washington Post, March 31, https://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/world/2017/03/31/while-trump-promotes-coal-other-countries-areturning-to-cheap-sun-power/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.3b4f7896b0b
Navarrete, Daniel Manuel and ChristineBuzinde. 2010. “Socio-Ecological Agency: From ‘Human Exceptionalism’ to Coping with ‘Exceptional’ Global Environmental Change.” In The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology, edited by MichaelRedclift and GrahamWoodgate, 136-149. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Noreña, Ana Lucía, NoemíAlcaraz-Moreno, Juan GuillermoRojas, and DinoraRebolledo-Malpica. 2012. “Aplicabilidad de los criterios de rigor y éticos en la investigación cualitativa.” Aquichan 12 (3): 263-274.
Parker, Cristián. 2017. “Chili: société civile en mouvement face au modèle néolibéral.” Alternatives Sud 24: 49-56.
Petit, Vicent. 2017. The Energy Transition. An Overview of the True Challenge of the 21st Century. Charm: Springer.
Poortinga, Wouter, LindaSteg, and CharlesVlek. 2004. “Values, Environmental Concern, and Environmental Behavior: A Study into Household Energy Use.” Environment & Behavior 36 (1): 70-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503251466
Rand, Joseph and BenHoen. 2017. “Thirty Years of North American Wind Energy Acceptance Research: What Have We Learned?” Energy Research & Social Science 29: 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.019
REN21. 2017. “Renewables 2017 Global Status Report.” REN21, accessed May 14, 2019, http://www.ren21.net/gsr-2017
Ropohl, Günter. 1999. “Philosophy of Socio-Technical Systems.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 4 (3): 186-194.
Running, Katrina. 2012. “Examining Environmental Concern in Developed, Transitioning and Developing Countries.” World Values Research 5 (1): 1-27.
Ryan, Daniel. 2017. “Politics and Climate Change: Exploring the Relationship between Political Parties and Climate Issues in Latin America.” Ambiente & Sociedade 20 (3): 271-286.
Schaeffer, Colombina and MattijsSmits. 2015. “From Matters of Fact to Places of Concern? Energy, Environmental Movements and Place-Making in Chile and Thailand.” Geoforum 65: 146-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.021
Schleicher-Tappeser, Ruggero. 2012. “How Renewables Will Change Electricity Markets in the Next Five Years.” Energy Policy 48: 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.042
Smith, Adrian. 2005. “The Alternative Technology Movement: An Analysis of Its Framing and Negotiation of Technology Development.” Human Ecology Review 12 (2): 106-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.002
Smith, Adrian, TomHargreaves, SabineHielscher, MariMartiskainen, and GillSeyfang. 2016. “Making the Most of Community Energies: Three Perspectives on Grassroots Innovation.” Environment and Planning A 48 (2): 407-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15597908
Smith, Adrian, Jan-PeterVoß, and JohnGrin. 2010. “Innovation Studies and Sustainability Transitions: The Allure of the Multi-Level Perspective and Its Challenges.” Research Policy 39 (4): 435-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023
Sovacool, Benjamin K. 2016. “How Long Will It Take? Conceptualizing the Temporal Dynamics of Energy Transitions.” Energy Research & Social Science 13: 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020
Stolten, Detlef and ViktorScherer. 2013. Transition to Renewable Energy Systems. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
Szulecki, Kacper. 2017. “Conceptualizing Energy Democracy.” Environmental Politics 27 (1): 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1387294
Temper, Leah, Daniela delBene, and JoanMartinez-Alier. 2015. “Mapping the frontiers and front lines of global environmental justice: the EJAtlas.” Journal of Political Ecology 22: 255-278.
Thompson, Griffin and MorganBazilian. 2014. “Democratization, Energy Poverty, and the Pursuit of Symmetry.” Global Policy 5 (1): 127-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12103
Toke, David. 2011. “Ecological Modernisation, Social Movements and Renewable Energy.” Environmental Politics 20 (1): 60-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.538166
Turcu, Catalina, YvonneRydin, and BrentPilkey. 2014. “Energy in the Locality: A Case for Local Understanding and Action.” Local Environment 19 (5): 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.921388
Ulli-Beer, Silvia, ed. 2013. Dynamic Governance of Energy Technology Change: Socio-Technical Transitions towards Sustainability. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag B.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). 2015. 2015 Energy Statistics Yearbook. New York: United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/energy/yearbook/default.htm
Watkins, Graham, Sven-UweMueller, HendrikMeller, María CeciliaRamírez, TomásSerebrisky, and AndreasGeorgoulias. 2017. Lecciones de cuatro décadas de conflicto en torno a los proyectos de infraestructura en América Latina y el Caribe. Washington: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
World Values Survey (WVS). 2014. “World Values Survey Wave 6 (2010-2014).” World Values Survey, accessed May 14, 2019, http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp
Yin, Robert K. 2003. Case Study Methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Licencia

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.