Revista de Estudios Sociales

rev. estud. soc. | eISSN 1900-5180 | ISSN 0123-885X

Local Energy Transition and Technical Knowledge in the Southern Cone: A Sociological Approach

No. 72 (2020-04-01)
  • Cristián Parker G.
    Universidad de Santiago de Chile

Abstract

Social research on the transition to renewable energies has focused on understanding public policies and social movements. Energy knowledge plays an important practical, normative, and social role that influences actors’ approaches to this transition, which has been scarcely studied at local or community levels, let alone in the Global South. A comparative methodology is used to study cases of communes in Argentina and Chile. The results are presented using a variety of data sources to explore the frameworks of the energy matrix and energy projects, revealing the role of technical knowledge in building local agency. This article presents a theoretical discussion and conclusions that include proposals for the future development of a more local, inclusive, committed and deliberative transition process, based on local technical expertise in renewable energies.

Keywords: Acceptability of renewable energies, local energy transition, renewable energies, socio-technical knowledge, South America

References

Agostini, Claudio, CarlosSilva, and ShahriyarNasirov. 2017. “Failure of Energy Mega-Projects in Chile: A Critical Review from Sustainability Perspectives.” Sustainability 9 (6): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061073

Ahlborg, Helene. 2017. “Towards a Conceptualization of Power in Energy Transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 25: 122-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.004

Baigorrotegui, Gloria. 2019. “Destabilization of Energy Regime and Liminal Transition through Collective Action in Chile.” Energy Research & Social Science 55: 198-207.

Baigorrotegui, Gloria and CristiánParker, eds. 2018. ¿Conectar o desconectar? Comunidades energéticas y transiciones hacia la sustentabilidad.Santiago: Editorial Estudios Avanzados; IDEA; USACH.

Bajoit, Guy. 2015. La maison du sociologue. Pour une théorie sociologique générale.Louvain-la-Neuve: Editions Academia-L’Harmattan.

Baker, Reg, J. MichaelBrick, Nancy A.Bates, MikeBattaglia, Mick P.Couper, Jill A.Dever, Krista J.Gile, and RogerTourangeau. 2013. “Summary Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-probability Sampling”. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 1 (2): 90-143. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smt008

Benford, Robert D. and David A.Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 611-639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611

Berger, Peter L. and ThomasLuckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City: Doubleday.

Berkhout, Frans, PeterMarcotullio, and TatsuyaHanaoka. 2012. “Understanding Energy Transitions.” Sustainability Science 7 (2): 109-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0173-5

Catney, Philip, SherilynMacGregor, AndrewDobson, Sarah MarieHall, SarahRoyston, ZoeRobinson, MarkOrmerod, and SimonRoss. 2014. “Big Society, Little Justice? Community Renewable Energy and the Politics of Localism.” Local Environment 19 (7): 715-730. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.792044

Cherp, Aleh, VadimVinichenko, JessicaJewell, ElinaBrutschin, and BenjaminSovacool. 2018. “Integrating Techno-Economic, Socio-Technical and Political Perspectives on National Energy Transitions: A Meta-Theoretical Framework.” Energy Research and Social Science 37: 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.015

Ciapuscio, Héctor. 1996. “El Conocimiento Tecnológico.” Redes 3 (6): 177-194.

Cowell, Richard, GillBristow, and MaxMunday. 2011. “Acceptance, Acceptability and Environmental Justice: The Role of Community Benefits in Wind Energy Development.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54 (4): 539-557. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.521047

Del Canto, Ero and AliciaSilva. 2013. “Metodología cuantitativa: abordaje desde la complementariedad en Ciencias Sociales.” Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Cr) 3 (141): 25-34.

Deng, Jing, Gordon J.Walker, and GuySwinnerton. 2006. “A Comparison of Environmental Values and Attitudes between Chinese in Canada and Anglo-Canadians.” Environment and Behavior 38 (1): 22-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505278458

Devine-Wright, Patrick. 2005. “Local Aspects of UK Renewable Energy Development: Exploring Public Beliefs and Policy Implications.” Local Environment 10 (1): 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354983042000309315

Dirección de Estudios Sociales del Instituto de Sociología de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (DESUC). 2018. “Informe final: ‘Encuesta Nacional de Medio Ambiente 2018’”. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente de Chile, accessed May 14, 2019, https://mma.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Informe-Final-Encuesta-Nacional-de-Medio-Ambiente-2018.pdf

Dunlap, Riley E. and AngelaMertig. 1997. “Global Environmental Concern: An Anomaly for Postmaterialism.” Social Science Quarterly 78: 24-29.

Dunlap, Riley E. and RichardYork. 2008. “The Globalization of Environmental Concern and The Limits of The Postmaterialist Values Explanation: Evidence from Four Multinational Surveys.” The Sociological Quarterly 49 (3): 529-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2008.00127.x

EY Power & Utilities. 2017. “Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index-RECAI. The Retail Energy Revolution.” EY Power & Utilities, accessed May 14, 2019, https://www.ey.com/publication/vwluassets/ey-recai-issue-50-october-2017/$file/ey-recai-issue-50-october-2017.pdf

EY Power & Utilities. 2019. “RECAI Issue 53: Index Scores.” EY Power & Utilities, accessed May 14, 2019, https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/es_mx/topics/power-and-utilities/ey-recai-index-53-scores-ladder.pdf

Fairchild, Denise and AlWeinrub. 2017. Energy Democracy. Advancing Equity in Clean Energy Solutions. Washington: Island Press; Center for Resource Economics.

FGV Energía.2016. Un análisis comparativo de la transición energética en América Latina y Europa. Lima: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

Froestad, Jan and CliffordShearing. 2017. “Energy and the Anthropocene: Security Challenges and Solutions.” Crime, Law and Social Change 68 (5): 515-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9700-8

Fuchs, Christian, WolfgangHofkirchner, and BertKlauninger. 2002. “The Dialectic of Bottom-up and Top-down Emergence in Social Systems.” INTAS Project “Human Strategies in Complexity”, Research Paper No. 8. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=385300

Fuchs, Gerhard and NeleHinderer. 2016. “Towards a Low Carbon Future: A Phenomenology of Local Electricity Experiments in Germany.” Journal of Cleaner Production 128: 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.078

Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hernando, Maite and GustavoBlanco. 2016. “Territorio y energías renovables no convencionales.” Gestión y Políticia Pública 25 (1): 165-202.

International Energy Agency (IEA). 2017. Renewables 2017. Analysis and Forecasts to 2022. Paris: OECD; IEA.

Kidd, Natalia. 2017. “Crece el rechazo ciudadano a proyecto de planta nuclear en la Patagonia argentina.” EFE, July 30, https://www.efe.com/efe/cono-sur/cronicas/crece-el-rechazo-ciudadanoa-proyecto-de-planta-nuclear-em-la-patagoniaargentina/50000803-3339523

“La energía nuclear acercó al país a la OCDE.” 2017. El Economista, May 22, http://www.eleconomista.com.ar/2017-05-la-energia-nuclear-acerco-al-pais-la-ocde/

Latinobarómetro. 2017. Informe 2017. Buenos Aires: Corporación Latinobarómetro.

Leff, Enrique. 2000. “Espacio, lugar y tiempo: la reapropiación social de la naturaleza y la construcción local de la racionalidad ambiental.” Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente 1: 57-69. https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v1i0.3057

Leiserowitz, Anthony A., Robert W.Kates, and Thomas M.Parris. 2006. “Sustainability Values, Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Review of Multinational and Global Trends.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31 (1): 413-44. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.102505.133552

Marshall, Martin N. 1996. “Sampling for Qualitative Research.” Family Practice 13 (6): 522-526. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522

Martínez Alier, Joan. 2009. El ecologismo de los pobres. Conflictos ambientales y lenguajes de valoración. Barcelona: Editorial Icaria.

Mendoza, Emma and VadimPérez. 2010. “Energías renovables y movimientos sociales en América Latina.” Estudios Internacionales 43 (165): 109-128.

Miroff, Nick. 2017. “‘A Solar Saudi Arabia’ While Trump Promotes Coal, Chile and Others Are Turning to Cheap Sun Power.” The Washington Post, March 31, https://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/world/2017/03/31/while-trump-promotes-coal-other-countries-areturning-to-cheap-sun-power/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.3b4f7896b0b

Navarrete, Daniel Manuel and ChristineBuzinde. 2010. “Socio-Ecological Agency: From ‘Human Exceptionalism’ to Coping with ‘Exceptional’ Global Environmental Change.” In The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology, edited by MichaelRedclift and GrahamWoodgate, 136-149. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Noreña, Ana Lucía, NoemíAlcaraz-Moreno, Juan GuillermoRojas, and DinoraRebolledo-Malpica. 2012. “Aplicabilidad de los criterios de rigor y éticos en la investigación cualitativa.” Aquichan 12 (3): 263-274.

Parker, Cristián. 2017. “Chili: société civile en mouvement face au modèle néolibéral.” Alternatives Sud 24: 49-56.

Petit, Vicent. 2017. The Energy Transition. An Overview of the True Challenge of the 21st Century. Charm: Springer.

Poortinga, Wouter, LindaSteg, and CharlesVlek. 2004. “Values, Environmental Concern, and Environmental Behavior: A Study into Household Energy Use.” Environment & Behavior 36 (1): 70-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503251466

Rand, Joseph and BenHoen. 2017. “Thirty Years of North American Wind Energy Acceptance Research: What Have We Learned?” Energy Research & Social Science 29: 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.019

REN21. 2017. “Renewables 2017 Global Status Report.” REN21, accessed May 14, 2019, http://www.ren21.net/gsr-2017

Ropohl, Günter. 1999. “Philosophy of Socio-Technical Systems.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 4 (3): 186-194.

Running, Katrina. 2012. “Examining Environmental Concern in Developed, Transitioning and Developing Countries.” World Values Research 5 (1): 1-27.

Ryan, Daniel. 2017. “Politics and Climate Change: Exploring the Relationship between Political Parties and Climate Issues in Latin America.” Ambiente & Sociedade 20 (3): 271-286.

Schaeffer, Colombina and MattijsSmits. 2015. “From Matters of Fact to Places of Concern? Energy, Environmental Movements and Place-Making in Chile and Thailand.” Geoforum 65: 146-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.021

Schleicher-Tappeser, Ruggero. 2012. “How Renewables Will Change Electricity Markets in the Next Five Years.” Energy Policy 48: 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.042

Smith, Adrian. 2005. “The Alternative Technology Movement: An Analysis of Its Framing and Negotiation of Technology Development.” Human Ecology Review 12 (2): 106-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.002

Smith, Adrian, TomHargreaves, SabineHielscher, MariMartiskainen, and GillSeyfang. 2016. “Making the Most of Community Energies: Three Perspectives on Grassroots Innovation.” Environment and Planning A 48 (2): 407-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15597908

Smith, Adrian, Jan-PeterVoß, and JohnGrin. 2010. “Innovation Studies and Sustainability Transitions: The Allure of the Multi-Level Perspective and Its Challenges.” Research Policy 39 (4): 435-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023

Sovacool, Benjamin K. 2016. “How Long Will It Take? Conceptualizing the Temporal Dynamics of Energy Transitions.” Energy Research & Social Science 13: 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020

Stolten, Detlef and ViktorScherer. 2013. Transition to Renewable Energy Systems. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.

Szulecki, Kacper. 2017. “Conceptualizing Energy Democracy.” Environmental Politics 27 (1): 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1387294

Temper, Leah, Daniela delBene, and JoanMartinez-Alier. 2015. “Mapping the frontiers and front lines of global environmental justice: the EJAtlas.” Journal of Political Ecology 22: 255-278.

Thompson, Griffin and MorganBazilian. 2014. “Democratization, Energy Poverty, and the Pursuit of Symmetry.” Global Policy 5 (1): 127-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12103

Toke, David. 2011. “Ecological Modernisation, Social Movements and Renewable Energy.” Environmental Politics 20 (1): 60-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.538166

Turcu, Catalina, YvonneRydin, and BrentPilkey. 2014. “Energy in the Locality: A Case for Local Understanding and Action.” Local Environment 19 (5): 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.921388

Ulli-Beer, Silvia, ed. 2013. Dynamic Governance of Energy Technology Change: Socio-Technical Transitions towards Sustainability. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag B.

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). 2015. 2015 Energy Statistics Yearbook. New York: United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/energy/yearbook/default.htm

Watkins, Graham, Sven-UweMueller, HendrikMeller, María CeciliaRamírez, TomásSerebrisky, and AndreasGeorgoulias. 2017. Lecciones de cuatro décadas de conflicto en torno a los proyectos de infraestructura en América Latina y el Caribe. Washington: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.

World Values Survey (WVS). 2014. “World Values Survey Wave 6 (2010-2014).” World Values Survey, accessed May 14, 2019, http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp

Yin, Robert K. 2003. Case Study Methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

License