Revista de Estudios Sociales

rev. estud. soc. | eISSN 1900-5180 | ISSN 0123-885X

Os debates da virada ontológica sobre o naturalismo moderno

No. 55 (2016-01-01)
  • Daniel Ruiz Serna
    McGill University, Canadá.
  • Carlos Del Cairo
    Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Bogotá, Colombia.
https://doi.org/10.7440/res55.2016.13

Resumo

A virada ontológica agrupa um conjunto de perspectivas que coincidem em seu interesse por propor alternativas ao dualismo entre natureza e cultura que o naturalismo moderno estruturou. Ao pôr em questionamento a concepção do que é o real, essas perspectivas reivindicam formas alternativas de entender as articulações entre o natural e o cultural, e, a partir disso, apresentam relevantes desafios para a compreensão das relações sociais do mundo contemporâneo. No campo dos conflitos socioambientais, certas linhas da ecologia política reivindicam que os “conflitos de distribuição cultural” não podem ser eludidos. Nesse sentido, a virada ontológica propõe chaves conceituais que podem resultar relevantes para compreender a configuração desses conflitos. Este artigo aborda, de maneira sintética, as proposições de alguns autores destacados na virada ontológica, muitos deles vinculados ao campo da antropologia, e oferece uma cartografia geral e introdutória sobre essa virada útil para aqueles que começam a se aproximar desse campo de análise.

Palavras-chave: Natureza, cultura (Thesaurus), teoria social, perspectivismo, ontologias relacionadas (palavras do autor)

Referências

Agamben, Giorgio.2004. The Open. Man and animal.Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Alberti, Benjamin, SeverinFowles, MartinHolbraad, YvonneMarshall, y ChristopherWitmore. 2011. “Worlds Otherwise: Archaeology, Anthropology, and Ontological Difference”. Current Anthropology52 (6): 896-912.http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/662027.

Bessire, Lucas y DavidBond.2014. “Ontological Anthropology and the Deferral of Critique”. American Ethnologist41 (3): 440-456.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/amet.12083.

Bird-David, Nurit. 1999. “‘Animism’ Revisited: Personhood, Environment, and Relational Epistemology”. Current Anthropology40 (1): 67-91.http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/200061.

Blaser, Mario.2009a. “Political Ontology. Cultural Studies without ‘Cultures’?”Cultural Studies23 (5): 873-896.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502380903208023.

Blaser, Mario.2009b. “The Threat of the Yrmo: The Political Ontology of a Sustainable Hunting Program”. American Anthropologist111 (1): 10-20.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01073.x.

Blaser, Mario.2013a. “Notes toward a political ontology of ‘environmental’ conflicts”. En Contested Ecologies: Dialogues in the South on Nature and Knowledge, editado por LesleyGreen, 13-27. Cape Town: HSRC Press.

Blaser, Mario.2013b. “Ontological Conflicts and the Stories of People in Spite of Europe”. Current Anthropology54 (5): 547-568.http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/672270.

Blaser, Mario.2014. “Ontology and Indigineity: on the Political Ontology of Heterogenous Assemblages”. Cultural Geographies21 (1): 49-58.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474474012462534.

Callon, Michael.1999. “Actor-Network Theory- The market test”. En Actor Network Theory and After, Editado por JohnLaw y JohnHassard, 191-195. Oxford: Blackwell.

Cameron, Emilie, Sarahde Leeuw y CarolineDesbiens. 2014. “Indigeneity and Ontology”. Cultural Geographies21 (1): 19-26.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474474013500229.

Candea, Matei.2010. “For the motion (2)”. En Ontology is just another Word for Culture: Motion Tabled at the 2008 Meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, University of Manchester, editado por SoumhyaVenkatesan. Critique of Anthropology30 (2): 172-179.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0308275X09364070.

Carrithers, Michael.2010. “For the motion (1)”. En Ontology is just another Word for Culture: Motion Tabled at the 2008 Meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, University of Manchester, editado por SoumhyaVenkatesan. Critique of Anthropology30 (2): 156-168.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0308275X09364070.

De la Cadena, Marisol. 2010. “Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes. Conceptual Reflections beyond ‘Politics’”. Cultural Anthropology25 (2): 334-370.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01061.x.

De la Cadena, Marisol. 2015. Earth Beings. Ecologies of Practice across Andean Worlds.Durham – Londres: Duke University Press.

Descola, Phillipe.2006. “Beyond Nature and Culture, Radcliffe’Brown Lecture in Social Anthropology, 2005”. Proceedings of the British Academy139: 137-155.

Descola, Phillipe.2012. Más alla de naturaleza y cultura. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Descola, Philippe y GísliPálsson.2001. Introducción anaturaleza y sociedad. Perspectivas antropológicas. México: Siglo XXI Editores.

Escobar, Arturo.2012. Más allá del tercer mundo. Globalización y diferencia. Bogotá: Icanh – Universidad del Cauca.

Garrido, Francisco.2007. “Sobre la epistemología ecológica”. En El paradigma ecológico en ciencias sociales, editado por FranciscoGarrido, José LuisSerrano, José LuisSolana y Manuel Gonzálezde Molina, 31-53. Barcelona: Icaria.

Hage, Ghassan.2014. “Critical Anthropology as a Permanent State of First Contact. Fieldsights - Theorizing the Contemporary”. Cultural Anthropology Online.http://www.culanth.org/fieldsights/473-critical-anthropology-as-a-permanent-state-of-first-contact.

Haraway, Donna.2008. When Species Meet.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Harvey, David.1996. Justice, Nature & the Geography of Difference.Malden: Blackwell.

Hinchliffe, Steve.2007. Geographies of Nature. Societies, Environments, Ecologies.Londres – Thousand Oaks: Sage

Holbraad, Martin.2010. “Against the motion (2)”. En Ontology is just another Word for Culture: Motion Tabled at the 2008 Meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, University of Manchester, editado por SoumhyaVenkatesan. Critique of Anthropology30 (2): 179-185.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0308275X09364070.

Hunt, Sarah.2014. “Ontologies of Indigeneity: The Politics of Embodying a Concept”. Cultural Geographies21 (1): 27-32.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474474013500226.

Kirksey, Eben y StefanHelmreich.2010. “The Emergence of Multispecies Ethnography”. Cultural Anthropology25 (4): 545-576.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x.

Kohn, Eduardo.2007. “How Dogs Dream: Amazonian Natures and the Politics of Transpecies Engagement”. American Ethnologist34 (1): 3-24.http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/ae.2007.34.1.3.

Kohn, Eduardo.2009. “A conversation with Philippe Descola”. Tipití7 (2): 135-152.

Kohn, Eduardo.2013. How Forests Think. Toward an Anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Kohn, Eduardo.2015. “Anthropology of ontologies”. Annual Review of Anthropology44: 311-327.

Latour, Bruno.1993. We Have Never Been Moderns. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno.1999. “On recalling ANT”. En Actor Network Theory and After, editado por JohnLaw y JohnHassard, 15-26. Oxford: Blackwell.

Latour, Bruno.2008. Reensamblar lo social. Una introducción a la teoría del actor red.Buenos Aires: Manantial.

Latour, Bruno.2009. “Perspcetivism: ‘Type’ or ‘bomb’?”Anthropology Today25 (2): 1-2.

Law, John.1992. “Notes on the Theory of the Actor-Network: Ordering, Strategy, and Heterogeneity”. System Practice5 (4): 379-393.

Ogden, Laura.2011. Swamplife. People, Gators, and Mangroves entagled in the Everglades.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Paleček, Martin y Mark.Risjord. 2012. “Relativism and the Ontological Turn within Anthropology”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences43(1): 3-23.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0048393112463335.

Povinelli, Elizabeth.2001. “Radical worlds: the anthropology of incommensurability and inconceivability”. Annual Review of Anthropology30: 319-334.http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.319.

Povinelli, Elizabeth.2013. Geontologies: A Requiem to Late Liberalism. Keynote Lecture, The Anthropocene Project. Humboldt University, Berlin.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6TL1gTg3LQ.

Povinelli, Elizabeth.2014. “Geontologies of the Otherwise”. Cultural Anthropology Online.http://culanth.org/fieldsights/465-geontologies-of-the-otherwise/.

Raffles, Hugh.2002. “El conocimiento íntimo”. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales173: 49-61.

Ramos, Alcida.2012. “The Politics of Perspectivism”. Annual Review of Anthropology41: 481-494.http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145950.

Reichel-Dolmatoff, Gerardo. 1997. Chamanes de la selva pluvial. Ensayos sobre los indios Tukano del Noroeste Amazónico. Londres: Themis.

Ruiz Serna, Daniel.2010. “Las premisas de la selva. Representaciones de la naturaleza en una zona de colonización campesina”. En Perspectivas antropológicas sobre la Amazonia contemporánea, editado por MargaritaChaves y Carlos DelCairo, 335-361. Bogotá: Icanh – PUJ

Santos-Granero, Fernando. 2010. Paisajes sagrados arahuacos. Nociones indígenas del territorio en tiempos de cambio y modernidad. En Perspectivas antropológicas sobre la Amazonia contemporánea, editado por MargaritaChaves y CarlosDel Cairo, 645-670. Bogotá: Icanh – PUJ.

Serres, Michel.2009. Écrivains, savants et philosophes font le tour du monde. París: Le Pommier.

Stengers, Isabelle.1997. La guerre des Sciences. Cosmopolitiques I. París: La Découverte.

Stengers, Isabelle.2000. The Invention of Modern Science. Minneapolis – Londres: University of Minnesota Press.

Stengers, Isabelle.2005a. “The Cosmopolitical proposal”. En Making Things Public, editado por BrunoLatour y PeterWeibel, 994-1003. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Stengers, Isabelle.2005b. “Introductory Notes on an Ecology of Practices”. Cultural Studies Review11 (1): 183-196.http://dx.doi.org/10.5130/csr.v11i1.3459.

Stengers, Isabelle.2010. “Including Nonhumans in Political Theory: Opening Pandora’s Box?”. En Political Matter. Technoscience, democracy, and public life, editado por BruceBraun y Sarah J.Whatmore, 3-33. Minneapolis – Londres: University of Minnesota Press.

Taylor, Anne-Christine. 2013. “Distinguishing Ontologies”. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory3 (1): 201-204.http://dx.doi.org/10.14318/hau3.1.016.

Uexküll, Jakob von.2010 [1934]. A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2003. “Perspectivismo y multinaturalismo en la América indígena”. En Racionalidad y discurso mítico, editado por AdolfoChaparro y ChristianSchimacher, 191-243. Bogotá: Universidad del Rosario – Icanh.

Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2004. “Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation”. Tipití2 (1): 3-22.

Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2010. Metafísicas caníbales. Líneas de antropología postestructural.Buenos Aires: Katz.

Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2012. “Immanence and Fear. Stranger-events and Subjects in Amazonia”. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory2 (1): 27-43.

Zournazi, Mary.2002. “A ‘Cosmo-Politics’. Risk, Hope, Change. A Conversation with Isabelle Stengers”. En Hope. New Philosophies for Change, editado por MaryZournazi, 244-272. Londres: Routledge.

Licença

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.