Revista de Estudios Sociales

rev. estud. soc. | eISSN 1900-5180 | ISSN 0123-885X

A democracia e seus outros. Uma contribuição a partir da semiótica para o debate sobre a erosão democrática

No. 74 (2020-10-01)
  • Sebastián Moreno Barreneche
https://doi.org/10.7440/res74.2020.02

Resumo

O debate sobre o retrocesso democrático e suas diversas manifestações é relevante na ciência política atual. Nesse sentido, este artigo tem o objetivo de apresentar algumas ferramentas da semiótica que, como é argumentado, podem ser úteis para tornar mais precisos os conceitos empregados nesse debate. À medida que as discussões conceituais em ciência política costumam ser articuladas com base em categorias de sentido que intervêm na interpretação da evidência empírica e da realidade social, este artigo consiste em uma análise das categorias “democracia”, “não-democracia” e “autoritarismo”, entre outras, a partir de seu posicionamento em um quadrado semiótico que possibilita ver as relações lógicas entre elas.

Palavras-chave: Autoritarismo, democracia, democratização, erosão da democracia, semiótica

Referências

Beetham, David. 2009. “Democracy. Universality and Diversity”. Ethics & Global Politics 2 (4): 281-296.

Berger, Peter y ThomasLuckmann. 1966. La construcción social de la realidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Bermeo, Nancy. 2016. “On Democratic Backsliding”. Journal of Democracy 27 (1): 5-19.

Bogaards, Matthijs. 2009. “How to Classify Hybrid Regimes? Defective Democracy and Electoral Authoritarianism”. Democratization 16 (2): 399-423.

Cassani, Andrea y LucaTomini. 2020. “Reversing Regimes and Concepts: From Democratization to Autocratization”. European Political Science 19: 272-287.

Collier, David y StevenLevitsky. 1997. “Democracy with Adjectives. Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research”. World Politics 49: 430-451.

Collier, David y RobertAdcock. 1999. “Democracy and Dichotomies: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts”. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 537-565.

Diamond, Larry. 2002. “Thinking about Hybrid Regimes”. Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 21-35.

Diamond, Larry. 2015. “Facing Up to the Democratic Recession”. Journal of Democracy 26 (1): 141-155.

Eco, Umberto. 1976. Tratado de semiótica general. Barcelona: Lumen.

Eco, Umberto. 1997. Kant y el ornitorrinco. Barcelona: Lumen.

Floch, Jean-Marie. 1990. Semiótica, marketing y comunicación. Barcelona: Paidós.

Foa, Roberto S. y YaschaMounk. 2017. “The Signs of Deconsolidation”. Journal of Democracy 28 (1): 5-16.

Fontanille, Jacques. 2008. Pratiques sémiotiques. París: Presses Universitaires de France.

Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. El fin de la historia y el último hombre. Barcelona: Grijalbo.

Gergen, Kenneth. 1999. An Invitation to Social Construction. Londres: Sage.

Habets, Ingrid. 2015. “Liberal Democracy: The Threat of Counter-Narratives”. European View 14: 145-154.

Hénault, Anne. 2012. Les enjeux de la sémiotique. París: Presses Universitaires de France.

Hjelmslev, Louis. 1943. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Huntington, Samuel. 1991. “Democracy’s Third Wave”. Journal of Democracy 2 (2): 12-34.

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Landowski, Eric. 2014. “Sociossemiótica: uma teoria geral do sentido”. Galaxia 27: 10-20.

Landowski, Eric. 2016. Interacciones arriesgadas. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Universidad de Lima.

Levitsky, Steven y LucanWay. 2015. “The Myth of Democratic Recession”. Journal of Democracy 26: 45-58.

Linz, Juan J. y AlfredStepan. 1996. “Toward Consolidated Democracies”. Journal of Democracy 7 (2): 14-33.

Lührmann, Anna y Staffan I.Lindberg. 2019. “A Third Wave of Autocratization Is Here: What Is New about It?”. Democratization 26 (7): 1095-1113.

Mechkova, Valeriya, AnnaLührmann y StaffanLindberg. 2017. “How Much Democratic Backsliding?”. Journal of Democracy 28 (4): 162-169.

Monsiváis Carrillo, Alejandro. 2020. “La indiferencia hacia la democracia en América Latina”. ICONOS 66: 151-171.

Mouffe, Chantal. 2018. For a Left Populism. Londres: Verso.

Plattner, Marc F. 2015. “Is Democracy in Decline?”. Journal of Democracy 26 (1): 5-10

Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics”. The American Political Science Review 64 (4): 1033-1053.

Schedler, Andreas. 1998. “What Is Democratic Consolidation?”. Journal of Democracy 9 (2): 91-107.

Schmitter, Philippe. 2015. “Crisis and Transition, but Not Decline”. Journal of Democracy 26 (1): 32-44.

Searle, John. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. Londres: Penguin.

Somers, Margaret. 1995. “What’s Political or Cultural about Political Culture and the Public Sphere? Toward an Historical Sociology of Concept Formation”. Sociological Theory 13 (2): 113-144.

Theocharis, Yannis. 2015. “The Conceptualization of Digitally Networked Participation”. Social Media + Society 1 (2): 1-14.

Tomini, Luca y ClaudiusWagemann. 2018. “Varieties of Contemporary Democratic Breakdown and Regression: A Comparative Analysis”. European Journal of Political Research 57 (3): 687-716.

V-Dem. 2019. “V-Dem Annual Democracy Report 2019: Democracy Facing Global Challenges”. V-Dem Institute, consultado el 2 de marzo de 2020, https://www.v-dem.net/en/publications/democracy-reports/

Van Deth, Jan. 2014. “A Conceptual Map of Political Participation”. Acta Politica 49: 349-367.

Verón, Eliseo. 1987. “La palabra adversativa. Observaciones sobre la enunciación política”. En El discurso político. Lenguajes y acontecimientos, editado por EliseoVerón, LeonorArfuch, María MagdalenaChirico, Emilio deIpola, NoemíGoldman, María Inés GonzálezBombal y OscarLandi, 11-26. Buenos Aires: Hachette.

Verón, Eliseo. 1988. La semiosis social. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Verón, Eliseo. 1989. “Semiótica y teoría de la democracia”. Revista de Occidente 92: 130-142.

Violi, Patrizia. 2017. “Due vie per la semiotica o un incrocio di sguardi? Algirdas Greimas e Umberto Eco a confronto”. Entornos 30 (1): 25-33.

Vygotsky, Lev. 1995. Pensamiento y lenguaje. Barcelona: Paidós.

Waldner, David y EllenLust. 2018. “Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding”. Annual Review of Political Science 21: 93-113.

Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy Is what States Make of It”. International Organization 46 (2): 391-425.

Wigell, Mikael. 2008. “Mapping ‘Hybrid Regimes’: Regime Types and Concepts in Comparative Politics”. Democratization 15 (20): 230-250.

Licença

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.