Percepçâo da desigualdade económica na vida cotidiana e ideología política: estudo com jovens da Espanha

Alcañiz, Mercedes y RosaMonteiro. 2016. “She-austerity. Women’s Precariousness and Labor Inequality in Southern Europe”. Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 72: 39-68.

Alvaredo, Facundo, LucasChancel, ThomasPiketty, EmmanuelSaez y GabrielZucman. 2018. “World Inequality Report 2018”. WIR. Consultado el 16 de junio de 2020. wir2018.wid.world

Azevedo, Flavio, John T.Jost, TobiasRothmund y JoannaSterling. 2019. “Neoliberal Ideology and the Justification of Inequality in Capitalist Societies: Why Social and Economic Dimensions of Ideology Are Intertwined”. Journal of Social Issues 75 (1): 49-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12310

Bardin, Lawrence. 2002. Análisis de contenido. 3.ª ed.Madrid: Ediciones Akal.

Bauer, Paul C., PabloBarberá, KathrinAckermann y AaronVenetz. 2017. “Is the Left-Right Scale a Valid Measure of Ideology?: Individual-Level Variation in Associations with ‘Left’ and ‘Right’ and Left-Right Self-Placement”. Political Behavior 39 (3): 553-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9368-2

Binelli, Chiara y MatthewLoveless. 2016. “The Urban-Rural Divide. Perceptions of Income and Social Inequality in Central and Eastern Europe”. Economics of Transition 24 (2): 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12087

Bruckmüller, Susanne, GerhardReese y Sarah E.Martiny. 2017. “Is Higher Inequality Less Legitimate? Depends on How You Frame It!”. British Journal of Social Psychology 56 (4): 766-781. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12202

Brussino, Silvia, DéboraImhoff, Ana PamelaPaz, MatíasDreizik y Hugo HernánRabbia. 2016. “¿Qué son la izquierda y la derecha en Argentina? Esquemas cognitivos de ciudadanos cordobeses”. Temas em Psicologia 24 (4): 1249-1264. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2016.4-04

Buttrick, Nicholas R. y ShigehiroOishi. 2017. “The Psychological Consequences of Income Inequality”. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 11 (3): e12304. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12304

Castillo, Juan Carlos, DanielMiranda y DiegoCarrasco. 2011. “La percepción desigual de la desigualdad. Una comparación de indicadores de percepción de desigualdad económica”. Documento de trabajo. Informes Técnicos MIDE UC, n.° IT1 101. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile.

Castillo, Juan Carlos, DanielMiranda y DiegoCarrasco. 2012. “Percepción de desigualdad económica en Chile : Medición, diferencias y determinantes”. Psykhe 21 (1): 99-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22282012000100007

Chambers, John R., Lawton K.Swan y MartinHeesacker. 2014. “Better Off than We Know”. Psychological Science 25 (2): 613-618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504965

Cherven, Ken. 2015. Mastering Gephi Network Visualization. Birmingham: Packt Publishing.

Chow, Rosalind M. y JeffGalak. 2012. “The Effect of Inequality Frames on Support for Redistributive Tax Policies”. Psychological Science 23 (12): 1467-1469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612450035

Dalege, Jonas, DennyBorsboom, Frenkvan Harreveld y Han L. J.van der Maas. 2017. “Network Analysis on Attitudes”. Social Psychological and Personality Science 8 (5): 528-537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617709827

Dawtry, Rael J., Robbie M.Sutton y Chris G.Sibley. 2015. “Why Wealthier People Think People Are Wealthier, and Why It Matters”. Psychological Science 26 (9): 1389-1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615586560

Easterbrook, Matthew J. 2021. “The Social Psychology of Economic Inequality”. Wider Working Paper 2021/43. https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2021/981-5

Eidelman, Scott y Christian S.Crandall. 2012. “Bias in Favor of the Status Quo”. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 6 (3): 270-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00427.x

Emmons, Scott, StephenKobourov, MikeGallant y KatyBörner. 2016. “Analysis of Network Clustering Algorithms and Cluster Quality Metrics at Scale”. PLoS ONE 11 (7): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159161

Eriksson, K. y BrentSimpson. 2012. “What Do Americans Know about Inequality? It Depends on How You Ask Them”. Judgment & Decision Making 7 (6): 741-745.

Eriksson, K. y BrentSimpson. 2013. “The Available Evidence Suggests the Percent Measure Should Not Be Used to Study Inequality: Reply to Norton and Ariely”. Judgment & Decision Making 8 (3): 395-396.

Fjeld, Anders y LauraQuintana. 2019. “Reinstitucionalización, formas de vida y acciones igualitarias: reinvenciones de lo común hoy contra el capitalismo neoliberal”. Revista de Estudios Sociales 70: 2-9. https://doi.org/10.7440/res70.2019.01

García-Castro, Juan Diego, EfraínGarcía-Sánchez, MarMontoya-Lozano y RosaRodríguez-Bailón. 2021. “The Perception of Economic Inequality in Everyday Life: My Friends with the Most and Least Money”. Asian Journal of Social Psychology: primero en línea. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12476.

García-Castro, Juan Diego, RosaRodríguez-Bailón y Guillermo B.Willis. 2020. “Perceiving Economic Inequality in Everyday Life Decreases Tolerance to Inequality”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 90: 104019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104019

García-Castro, Juan Diego, Guillermo B.Willis y RosaRodríguez-Bailón. 2019. “I Know People Who Can and Who Cannot: A Measure of the Perception of Economic Inequality in Everyday Life”. The Social Science Journal 56 (4): 599-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.09.008

García-Sánchez, Efraín. En prensa. “Investigar la percepción de la desigualdad económica en psicología y ciencias sociales: consideraciones para la construcción de una agenda de investigación”. En Ejemplos de método e investigaciones sociales. Aplicaciones en psicología organizacional y del trabajo y en psicología social, editado por EricoRentería-Pérez, EfraínGarcía-Sánchez y SigmarMalvezzi. Cali: Programa Editorial de la Universidad del Valle.

García-Sánchez, Efraín, Guillermo B.Willis, RosaRodríguez-Bailón, Juan DiegoGarcía-Castro, JorgePalacio-Sañudo, JeanPolo y EricoRentería-Pérez. 2018. “Perceptions of Economic Inequality in Colombian Daily Life: More than Unequal Distribution of Economic Resources”. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01660

Gimpelson, Vladimir y DanielTreisman. 2018. “Misperceiving Inequality”. Economics and Politics 30 (1): 27-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12103

Guzmán, Virginia, EmmanuelleBarozet y María LuisaMéndez. 2017. “Legitimación y crítica a la desigualdad: una aproximación pragmática”. Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 24 (73): 87-112. https://doi.org/10.29101/crcs.v0i73.4239

Hauser, Oliver P. y Michael I.Norton. 2017. “(Mis)Perceptions of Inequality”. Current Opinion in Psychology 18: 21-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.024

Irwin, Sarah. 2018. “Lay Perceptions of Inequality and Social Structure”. Sociology 52 (2): 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516661264

Jachimowicz, Jon M., ShaiDavidai, DanielaGoya-Tocchetto, BarnabasSzaszi, Martin V.Day, StephanieTepper, TaylorPhillips, M. UsmanMirza, NailyaOrdabayeva y Oliver P.Hauser. 2020. “Inequality in Researchers’ Minds”. PsyArXiv Pre-Prints s. n.: 1-30. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gn2z5

Jetten, Jolanda y KimPeters. 2019. The Social Psychology of Inequality. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Jetten, Jolanda, ZhechenWang, Niklas K.Steffens, FrankMols, KimPeters y MaykelVerkuyten. 2017. “A Social Identity Analysis of Responses to Economic Inequality”. Current Opinion in Psychology 18 (17): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.011

Jost, John T. 2006. “The End of the End of Ideology”. The American Psychologist 61 (7): 651-670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651

Jost, John T. 2017. “Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology”. Political Psychology 38 (2): 167-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12407

Jost, John T. y OrsolyaHunyady. 2005. “Antecedents and Consequences of System-Justifying Ideologies”. Current Directions in Psychological Science 14 (5): 260-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x

Jost, John T., IdoLiviatan, Jojannekevan der Toorn, AlisonLedgerwood, AnesuMandisodza y Brian A.Nosek. 2009. “System Justification: How Do We Know It’s Motivated?”. En The Psychology of Justice and Legitimacy: The Ontario Symposium, editado por RamonaBobocel, Aaron C.Kay, Mark P.Zanna y James M.Olson, 173-203. Nueva York; Ontario: Psychology Press.

Jost, John T. y E. P.Thompson. 2000. “Group-Based Dominance and Opposition to Equality as Independent Predictors of Self-Esteem, Ethnocentrism, and Social Policy Attitudes among African Americans and European Americans”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 36 (3): 209-232. https://doi.org/DOI10.1006Zjesp.1999.1403

Kiatpongsan, Sorapop y Michael I.Norton. 2014. “How Much (More) Should CEOs Make? A Universal Desire for More Equal Pay”. Perspectives on Psychological Science 9 (6): 587-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614549773

Kraus, Michael W., Jun WonPark y Jacinth J. X.Tan. 2017. “Signs of Social Class: The Experience of Economic Inequality in Everyday Life”. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12 (3): 422-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616673192

Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2.a ed. California: Sage.

Kuhn, Andreas. 2020. “The Individual (Mis-)Perception of Wage Inequality: Measurement, Correlates and Implications”. Empirical Economics 59 (5): 2039-2069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01722-4

Landis, J. Richard y Gary G.Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data”. Biometrics 33 (1): 159-174. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMA.2010.328

Loveless, Matthew y StephenWhitefield. 2011. “Being Unequal and Seeing Inequality: Explaining the Political Significance of Social Inequality in New Market Democracies”. European Journal of Political Research 50 (2): 239-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01929.x

Lowery, Brian S., Rosalind M.Chow y Jennifer RandallCrosby. 2009. “Taking from Those that Have More and Giving to Those that Have Less: How Inequity Frames Affect Corrections for Inequity”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45 (2): 375-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.010

McCall, Leslie. 2013. The Undeserving Rich. American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity and Redistribution. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

McLeod, J. D., Edward J.Lawler y MichaelSchwalbe. 2014. Handbook of the Social Psychology of Inequality. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Minkoff, Scott L. y JeffreyLyons. 2019. “Living With Inequality: Neighborhood Income Diversity and Perceptions of the Income Gap”. American Politics Research 47 (2): 329-361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17733799

Newman, Benjamin J., SonoShah y ErinnLauterbach. 2018. “Who Sees an Hourglass? Assessing Citizens’ Perception of Local Economic Inequality”. Research & Politics 5 (3): en línea. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018793974

Niehues, Judith. 2014. “Subjective Perceptions of Inequality and Redistributive Preferences: An International Comparison”. IW Working Paper Cologne. https://www.relooney.com/NS3040/000_New_1519.pdf

Norton, Michael. I. y DanAriely. 2011. “Building a Better America —One Wealth Quintile at a Time”. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6: 9-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393524

Nussbaum, Martha. 2012. Crear capacidades: propuesta para el desarrollo humano. Madrid: Paidós.

Oxfam Internacional. 2018. “Reward Work, Not Wealth: To End the Inequality Crisis, We Must Build an Economy for Ordinary Working People, Not the Rich and Powerful”. Oxfam. Consultado el 16 de junio de 2020. https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/handle/10546/620396

Pedersen, Rasmus T. y Diana C.Mutz. 2019. “Attitudes toward Economic Inequality: The Illusory Agreement”. Political Science Research and Methods 7 (4): 835-851. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.18

Pedersen, Rasmus T. y MartinVinæs Larsen. 2018. “Putting a Number on Preferences: How Numerical Attitudes Are Shaped by Ideology and Equivalency Framing”. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 31 (3): 528-548. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edy020

Peterson, E. Wesley. 2017. “Is Economic Inequality Really a Problem? A Review of the Arguments”. Social Sciences 6 (4): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6040147

Phillips, L. Taylor, Stephanie J.Tepper, DanielaGoya-Tocchetto, ShaiDavidai, NailyaOrdabayeva, M. UsmanMirza, BarnabasSzaszi, Martin V.Day, Oliver P.Hauser y Jon M.Jachimowicz. 2020. “Inequality in People’s Minds”. PsyArXiv Pre-Prints s. n.: en línea. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vawh9

Piketty, Thomas. 2014. El capital en el siglo XXI. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Pleyers, Geoffrey. 2019. “Pensar los actores conservadores y capitalistas como movimientos sociales”. Revista de Estudios Sociales 67: 116-123. https://doi.org/10.7440/res67.2019.09

Rodríguez-Bailón, Rosa, BoykaBratanova, Guillermo B.Willis, LucíaLópez-Rodríguez, AshleySturrock y SteveLoughnan. 2017. “Social Class and Ideologies of Inequality: How They Uphold Unequal Societies”. Journal of Social Issues 73 (1): 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12206

Rodríguez-Bailón, Rosa, ÁngelSánchez-Rodríguez, EfraínGarcía-Sánchez, KaterinaPetkanopoulou y Guillermo BWillis. 2020. “Inequality Is in the Air: Contextual Psychosocial Effects of Power and Social Class”. Current Opinion in Psychology 33: 120-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.004

Scott, John. 2017. Social Network Analysis. 4.ª ed.Los Ángeles: Sage.

Sterling, Joanna, John T.Jost y RichardBonneau. 2020. “Political Psycholinguistics: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Language Habits of Liberal and Conservative Social Media Users”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 118 (4): 805-834. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000275

Sterling, Joanna, John T.Jost y Curtis D.Hardin. 2019. “Liberal and Conservative Representations of the Good Society: A (Social) Structural Topic Modeling Approach”. SAGE Open 9 (2): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019846211

Tronco, José del y AlejandroMonsiváis-Carrillo. 2020. “La erosión de la democracia”. Revista de Estudios Sociales 74: 2-11. https://doi.org/10.7440/res74.2020.01

Xu, Ping y James C.Garand. 2010. “Economic Context and Americans’ Perceptions of Income Inequality”. Social Science Quarterly 91 (5): 1220-1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00729.x

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.