Relevant Aspects of Ethically Responsive Virtual Learning Designs: Practical Recommendations From a Delphi Panel
No. 1 (2023-12-11)Author(s)
-
José Alberto Rivera PiragautaUNAD
-
Janaina Minelli de OliveiraORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5946-3622
Abstract
Education has been understood as a system, where the teaching-learning process and ethical values are necessarily articulated. This study identifies some key actions to consider in learning designs that are sensitive to important ethical issues in virtual learning environments. The Delphi methodology was applied with two rounds and a survey with three query categories. A group of ten experts agreed on the three proposed categories: instructional design, tutorial action and evaluation, which allowed analyzing the ethical behavior of students and teachers. The two rounds made it possible to obtain the required consensus on most of the proposed actions. However, other activities obtained a weighted percentage that allowed to establish some reflections on shortcomings and at the same time suggestions in the interaction of learning in a virtual environment. As a necessity to support an honest and comprehensive education, the opinions of the experts were accepted to guide a new lease on virtual education. It is inferred that the interactions among students and teachers in a virtual learning environment do not respond exclusively to digital and didactic strategies. It is also required to assume the ethical experience inherent in those interactions.
References
Alake-Tuenter, E., H. Biemans, H. Tobi y M. Mulder. (2013). Inquiry-based science teaching competence of primary school teachers: A Delphi study. Teaching and Teacher Education 35, 13-24.
Alvarez, I., Calvo, J. A., & Mora, A. (2014). Involving academics in the accounting standard setting process: Anapplication of the Delphi methodology to the assessment of IASB proposals. Journal of Management and Governance, 18 (3), 765–791.
Buchanan, R., Forster, J., Douglas, S., Nakar, S., Boon, J., Heath, T., … Tesar, M. (2021). Philosophy of education in a new key: Exploring new ways of teaching and doing ethics in education in the 21st century. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1-20. doi:10.1080/00131857.2021.1880387
Bustamante, S., Ehlscheidt, R., Pelzeter, A., Deckmann, A. y Freudenberger, F. (2020). The effect of values on the attractiveness of responsible employers for young job seekers. Journal of Human Values, 27 (1), 27-48. doi:10.1177/0971685820973522
Chalmers, D. J. (2017). The virtual and the real. Disputatio 9, 309-352. doi: 10.1515/disp-2017-0009
Cortina, A. (2012). Ética mínima: Introducción a la filosofía práctica. Madrid: Tecnos.
Duart, J. y Sangrà, A. (2000). Aprender en la virtualidad. Gedisa, Barcelona: Ediciones de la Universidad Oberta de Catalunya.
Dunn,W.N. (2004). Public policy analysis. An introduction (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Ellis, G. (2020). A mathematical cosmologist reflects on deep ethics: Reflections on values, ethics and morality. Theology and Science, 1-15. doi:10.1080/14746700.2020.1755533
Freeman, D., Reeve, S., Robinson, A., Ehlers, A., Clark, D., Spanlang, B. et al. (2017). Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding and treatment of mental health disorders. Psychol. Med. 47, 2393–2400. doi: 10.1017/S003329171700040X
Frosh, Paul. (2016). The mouse, the screen and the holocaust witness: Interface aesthetics and moral response. New Media and Society. doi:10.1177/1461444816663480
Gracia, J. (2018). El desafío ético de la educación. Madrid: Dykinson.
Gracht, H. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi studies review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(8), 1525-1536.
Green, R. A. (2014). The Delphi technique in educational research. SAGE Open 4 (2), 1-8.
Grigorenko, E. L. (2019). Creatividad en la realidad digital. Estudios de Psicología, 1-23. doi:10.1080/0210939 5.2019.1660122
Halak, B. y El-Hajjar, M. (2019). Design and evaluation of plagiarism prevention and detection techniques in engineering education. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4 (1), 197-208. doi:10.1080/23752696.2018.1563757
Ives, B. y Nehrkorn, A. (2019). A research review: Post-secondary interventions to improve academic integrity. Prevention and Detection of Academic Misconduct in Higher Education (pp. 39-62) 10.4018/978-1-5225-7531-3.ch002.
Izaquita, C. (2013). La prevalencia de Pestalozzi en el entorno educativo del siglo XXI. RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad, 1, 49-58. 10.22209/rhs. v1n1a04.
Jafari, E. y Alamolhoda, J. (2021). Lived experience of faculty members of ethics in virtual education. Tech Know Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09577-4
Khathayut, P. y Walker-Gleaves, C. (2020). Academic faculty conceptualisation and understanding of plagiarism – A Thai university exploratory study. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1-15. doi:10.1080/0309877x.2020.1795093
Lapsley, D. y Woodbury, R. (2016). Moral-Character Development for Teacher Education. Action in Teacher Education, 38 (3), 194–206. doi:10.1080/01626620.2016.1194785 Levy, P. (1998). ¿Qué es lo virtual? Barcelona: PAIDÓS
McGrath, R. E., Han, H., Brown, M. y Meindl, P. (2021). What does character education mean to character education experts? A prototype analysis of expert opinions. Journal of Moral Education, 1-19. doi:10.1080/03057240.2020.1862073
McQueen, H. A. y Shields, C. (2017). “Where facebook meets plagiarism: An investigation and an intervention”. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 5 (3), 33–44. doi:10.14297/jpaap.v5i3.260.
Mèlich, J. y Boixader, A. (2010). Los márgenes de la moral. Una mirada ética a la educación. Barcelona: GRAÓ.
Muñiz-Rodríguez, L., Alonso, P., Rodríguez-Muñiz, L. J. y Valcke, M. (2017). Developing and validating a competence framework for secondary mathematics student teachers through a Delphi method. Journal of Education for Teaching, 1-17. doi:10.1080/02607476.2017.1296539
Nash, K. (2018). Virtual reality witness: Exploring the ethics of mediated presence. Studies in Documentary Film, 12 (2), 119-131. doi:10.1080/17503280.2017.134079
Nardo, A. y Gaydos, M. (2021). “Wicked problems” as catalysts for learning in educational ethics games. Ethics and Education, 16 (4), 492-509, DOI: 10.1080/17449642.2021.1979283
Novella-García, C. y Cloquell-Lozano, A. (2021) The ethical dimension of digital competence in teacher training. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3529-3541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10436-z
Pecorari, D. (2019). Can plagiarism be defined? En D. Pecorari y P. Shaw (eds.), Student plagiarism in higher education: Reflections on teaching practice (pp. 12-27). Croydon: Routledge.
Pecorari, D. y Shaw, P. (2019). So what should we do? En D. Pecorari y P. Shaw (eds.), Student plagiarism in higher education: Reflections on teaching practice, 157-167. Croydon: Routledge.
Pestalozzi, J. H. (1987). Cartas sobre educación infantil. Madrid: Tecnos. Polo, M. (2019). La responsabilidad ética. Veritas, 42, 49-72. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-92732019000100049
Rajanala, S., Maymone, M. B. C. y Vashi, N. A. (2018). Selfies-living in the era of filtered photographs. JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0486
Ramot, R. y Bialik, G. (2022). Toward a consensual definition of educational research and development: A Delphi study. Higher Education Research & Development, DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2022.2052814
Rowe, G. y Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. Int J Forecast, 15, 353-75.
Rivera, J. y de Oliveira, J. (2022). The ethical commitment of virtual education. Journal of Educators Online, 19, 2. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2022.19.2.9
Rivera, J. y de Oliveira, J. (2020). Más allá del plagio: relevancia de la ética en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. eticanet. V20 I1.15140. http://dx.doi.org/10.30827
Rivera, J. y de Oliveira, J. (2017). El problema ético de la identidad digital en la educación virtual. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 75 (2), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie7522633
Rifinski, D., Erel, H., Feiner, A., Hoffman, G. y Zuckerman, O. (2020). Human-human-robot interaction: Robotic object’s responsive gestures improve interpersonal evaluation in human interaction. Human–Computer Interaction, 1-27. doi:10.1080/07370024.2020.1719839
San-Jose, L. y Retolaza, J. L. (2017). Ethics in finance research: Recommendations from an academic experts Delphi panel. Journal of Academic Ethics. DOI:10.1007/s10805-017-9293-and
Santoso, A. y Cahaya F. R. (2019). Factors influencing plagiarism by accounting lecturers. Accounting Education, 28 (4), 401-425. doi:10.1080/09639284.2018.1523736
Sourani, A. y Sohail, M. (2014). The Delphi method: Review and use in construction management research. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 11 (1), 54-76. doi:10.1080/15578771.2014.917132
Sutherland-Smith, W. (2019). Is student plagiarism still a serious problem in university today? En D. Pecorari y P. Shaw (eds.), Student plagiarism in higher education: Reflections on teaching practice (pp. 47-61). Croydon: Routledge.
Thando, N. (2021). Disembodiment, anonymity and oppressive freedom: An ethical enlightenment for virtual ontology. South African Journal of Philosophy, 40 (2), 137-145, DOI: 10.1080/02580136.2021.1933726
Teja, B. (2011). Ethical-based curriculum for emerging education towards an ideal society. Journal of Human Values, 17 (1), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/097168581001700105
Xue Eryong y Jian Li (2021). What is the ultimate education task in China? Exploring “strengthen moral education for cultivating people” (“Li De Shu Ren”). Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53 (2), 128-139, DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2020.1754539
Yu, Z. (2021). The effect of teacher presence in videos on intrinsic cognitive loads and academic achievements.
Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-12. doi:10.1080/14703297.2021.1889394