Voces y Silencios. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación

Voces silec. rev. latinoam. educ. | eISSN 2215-8421

Design de um curso de pensamento computacional para estudantes de artes e humanidades em uma universidade colombiana

No. 1 (2026-03-13)
https://doi.org/10.18175/VyS17.1.2026.5

Resumo

Estudar como se ensina e se aprende programação tornou-se cada vez mais relevante em espaços acadêmicos universitários, especialmente diante de ofertas curriculares interdisciplinares como as artes eletrônicas e as humanidades digitais. Este estudo utiliza um modelo de investigação crítico e participativo para analisar como se usam e se desenvolvem as habilidades de pensamento computacional (PC) nos estudantes de programas de Artes Humanidades e propor um curso de introdução ao PC desenhado especificamente para este contexto. Os dados analisados foram obtidos a partir de entrevistas com professores da Faculdade sobre conhecimento, desenvolvimento e uso do PC, e artefatos como testes de PC e reflexões dentro de um curso virtual de introdução ao PC. O curso incluiu conceitos de PC e foi estruturado numa transição de atividades como a codificação, decodificação e criação de poemas com algoritmos até a marcação de texto com HTML, para finalmente chegar à programação introdutória utilizando Processing em p5.js. Entre os professores da Faculdade, destacou-se a crença de que o PC se desenvolve por meio do uso de softwares de edição e gestão de dados. Os resultados do curso mostram que inicialmente os estudantes tinham um desempenho baixo em PC, mas ao longo do curso o desempenho dos estudantes nos testes melhorou significativamente. Esta pesquisa conclui que o desenvolvimento do PC na Faculdade de Artes e Humanidades de uma universidade privada colombiana pode ser fortalecido através de um curso introdutório como o proposto.

Palavras-chave: arte, humanidades, educação, educação STEAM, educação superior, pensamento computacional, programação

Referências

Argoti Álvarez, J. A. (2024). El pensamiento computacional como soporte del pensamiento matemático, en la Institución Educativa Santo Domingo Savio de Chinchiná (Caldas, Colombia). Voces y Silencios: Revista Latinoamericana de Educación, 15(1), 107-144. https://doi.org/10.18175/VyS15.1.2024.5

Bell, J., y Bell, T. (2018). Integrating computational thinking with a music education context. Informatics in Education, 17(2), 151- 166. https://10.15388/infedu.2018.09

Bellos, D. (2010). Mathematics, poetry, fiction: The adventure of the Oulipo. BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics, 25(2), 104-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/17498430903489237

Berry, D. M., y Fagerjord, A. (2017). Digital humanities: Knowledge and critique in a digital age. John Wiley & Sons.

Brennan, K., y Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking [conferencia]. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canadá.

Biernacki, P., y Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418101000205

Buitrago Flórez, F., Casallas, R., Hernández, M., Reyes, A., Restrepo, S., y Danies, G. (2017). Changing a generation’s way of thinking: Teaching computational thinking through programming. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 834-860. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317710096

Buitrago Flórez, F. J. (2018). Designing, implementing and evaluating, a first step approach for computational thinking development in novice students [tesis de doctorado, Universidad de los Andes]. Biblioteca Uniandes. http:// biblioteca.uniandes.edu.co/acepto201699.php?id=17463.pdf

Carranza, M. M. (2003). Tengo miedo. El Áncora Editores.

Caskurlu, S., Hu, A. D., Yadav, A., y Santo, R. (2022). Computational thinking integration design principles in humanities. En L. Markle, M. Doyle, J. Sheard, L.K. Soh y B. Dorn (coord.), Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (vol. 2, pp. 1120-1120). https://doi.org/10.1145/3478432.3499071

Espinal, A., Vieira, C., y Guerrero-Bequis, V. (2023). Student ability and difficulties with transfer from a block-based programming language into other programming languages: A case study in Colombia. Computer Science Education, 33(4), 567-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2022.2079867

Gorson, J., y O’Rourke, E. (2019). How do students talk about intelligence? An investigation of motivation, self-efficacy, and mindsets in computer science. En R. McCartney, A. Petersen, A. Robins y A. Moscal (coords.), Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ‘19) (pp. 21-29). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3291279.3339413

Gorson, J., Patel, N., Beheshti, E., Magerko, B., y Horn, M. (2017). TunePad: Computational thinking through sound composition. En P. Bilkstein y D. Abrahamson (coords.), Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ‘17) (pp. 484-489). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3084313

Green, H. E. (2014). Facilitating communities of practice in digital humanities: Librarian collaborations for research and training in text encoding. The Library Quarterly, 84(2), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1086/675332

Greher, G. R., y Heines, J. M. (2014). Computational thinking in sound: Teaching the art and science of music and technology. Oxford University Press.

Guzdial, M. (2023a). Scaffolding to support humanities students’ programming in a human language context. En M.-J. Laakso y M. Monga (coords.), Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (vol. 2, pp. 579-580). https://doi.org/10.1145/3587103.3594157

Guzdial, M. (2023b). Scaffolding to support liberal arts students learning to program on photographs. En Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (vol. 2, pp. 577-578). https:// doi.org/10.1145/3587103.3594158

Harris, D. (2017). An easy-to-use p5.js 3D object picker for visual artists. Journal of Open Source Software, 2(20), art. 475. https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.00475

Horn, M., Banerjee, A., West, M., Pinkard, N., Pratt, A., Freeman, J., Magerko, B., y McKlin, T. (2020). TunePad: Engaging learners at the intersection of music and code. En M. Gresalfi y I. S. Horn (eds.), The interdisciplinarity of the learning sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020, (vol. 3, pp. 1237-1244). International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/6320

Horn, M. S., Banerjee, A., Bar-El, D., y Wallace, I. H. (2020). Engaging families around museum exhibits: Comparing tangible and multi-touch interfaces. En E. Rubegni y A. Vaalou (coords.), Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference (pp. 556-566).

Jiang, S., & Wong, G. K. W. (2018). Are Children More Motivated with Plugged or Unplugged Approach to Computational Thinking?. En T. Barnes y D. Garica (coords.), Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education 1094. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3162270

Kafai, Y. B., Proctor, C., & Lui, D. A. (2019). Framing computational thinking for computational literacies in K-12 education. En Proceedings of the Weizenbaum Conference 2019: Challenges of Digital Inequality, (pp. 131-136). https://doi.org/10.34669/WI.CP/2.21

Koh, A. (2014). Niceness, building, and opening the genealogy of the digital humanities: Beyond the social contract of humanities computing. Differences, 25(1), 93- 106. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2420015

Kuchina, S. A. (2018). On generative poetry: Structural, stylistic and lexical features. MATLIT: Materialidades Da Literatura, 6(1), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.14195/2182-8830_6-1_5

Lave, J., y Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Madden, M. E., Baxter, M., Beauchamp, H., Bouchard, K., Habermas, D., Huff, M., Ladd, B., Pearon, J., y Plague, G. (2013). Rethinking STEM education: An interdisciplinary STEAM curriculum. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 541- 546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.316

McCarthy, L., Reas, C., y Fry, B. (2015). Getting started with P5. js: Making interactive graphics in JavaScript and processing. Maker Media.

Mejias, S., Thompson, N., Sedas, R. M., Rosin, M., Soep, E., Peppler, K., Roche, J., Wong, J., Hurley, M., Bell, P., y Bevan, B. (2021). The trouble with STEAM and why we use it anyway. Science Education, 105(2), 209-231. https://doi. org/10.1002/sce.21605

Peppler, K., y Wohlwend, K. (2018). Theorizing the nexus of STEAM practice. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 88- 99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1316331

Diccionario de la lengua española Real Academia Española. (S. f.). Uso [entrada]. Diccionario de la lengua española (23.ª ed.).

Reas, C., y Fry, B. (2007). Processing: A programming handbook for visual designers and artists. MIT Press.

Rubio, J. C., y Hernández, C. (2022). EVALUARTE: Una propuesta desde la evaluación formativa. Voces y Silencios: Revista Latinoamericana de Educación, 13(1), 1-32.

Ruthmann, A., Heines, J. M., Greher, G. R., Laidler, P., & Saulters, C. (2010). Teaching computational thinking through musical live coding in scratch. En G. Lewandowski y S. Wolfman (coords.), Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 351-355). https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734384

Sarachan, J. (2017, noviembre 4). SEM06-visualizations using p5.js for digital humanities projects [video]. STARS. https:// stars.library.ucf.edu/hastac2017/hacktheabstract/videos/31/

Saxena, A., Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., y Wong, G. K. W. (2020). Designing unplugged and plugged activities to cultivate computational thinking: An exploratory study in early childhood education. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00478-w

Skovsmose, O., y Borba, M. (2004). Research methodology and critical mathematics education. En P. Valero y R. Zevenbergen (eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education (vol. 35, pp. 207-226). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7914-1_17

Terry, P. (2019). The penguin book of Oulipo: Queneau, Perec, Calvino and the adventure of form. Penguin Books Limited.

Tew, A. E., Fowler, C., y Guzdial, M. (2005). Tracking an innovation in introductory CS education from a research university to a two-year college. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(1), 416-420. https://doi.org/10.1145/1047124.1047481

Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi. org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Wohlwend, K. (2013). Mediated discourse analysis. New Methods of Literacy Research, 56.

Zamora, M., y Jacobi, M. 2015. What is generative literature? Introducing “The Generative LiteratureProject”. Hybrid Pedagogy. https://hybridpedagogy.org/what-is-generative-literature-introducing-the-generative-literature-project/#:~:text=The%20Generative%20Literature%20Project%20is,Ouvroir%20delitt%C3%A9rature%20 potentielle)%20in%20France.