Technology and Feminism: A Strange Couple
No. 51 (2015-01-01)Author(s)
-
Joan Pujol
-
Marisela Montenegro
Abstract
The “gender digital divide” constitutes a prolific research program that compares the differences between women and men in access to Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). Nevertheless, those using feminist socio-constructivist perspectives argue for the need to pay attention, not only to “access,” but also to “design,” in addition to considering social relations as something that is coded within technological artifacts. From this perspective, gender constitutes an integral part of technological production. This paper explores the co-constitution of gender and technology, considering a specific action– research experience. It is argued that the re-signification of gendered and technological codes drifts through: a) the opening of gendered and technological codes; b) the production of new cultural imaginaries that question hegemonic representations of gender; and c) the production of new subjectivities through the reorganization of socio-technical practices to develop performative acts that transform patriarchal relations.
References
Arns, Inke.2005. El código como acto de habla performativo. Artnodes. Revista de Arte, Ciencia y Tecnologia. <http://www.uoc.edu/artnodes/espai/esp/art/arns0505.pdf>.
Bauman, Zygmunt.2011. Culture in a Liquid Modern World. Cambridge – Malden: Polity Press – Blackwell.
Beck, Ulrich.2000. The Brave New World of Work. Cambridge – Malden: Polity Press.
Beck, Ulrich.2004. Cosmopolitical Realism: On the Distinction between Cosmopolitanism in Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Global Networks4, n° 2: 131-156.
Bimber, Bruce.2000. Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet. Social Science Quarterly81, n° 3: 868-876.
Blair, Kristine and PamelaTakayoshi (eds.). 1999. Feminist Cyberscapes: Mapping Gendered Academic Spaces (New Directions in Computers and Composition Studies). Stamford: Ablex Publishing Corp.
Blissett, Luther and SonjaBrünzels. 2000. Manual de Guerrilla de la Comunicación.Barcelona: Editorial Virus.
Brady, Mick.2000. The Digital Divide Myth. Commerce Times. <http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/3953.html>.
Broadband Commission Working Group (BCWG). 2013. Doubling Digital Opportunities – Enhancing the Inclusion of Women & Girls in the Information Society.ITU and UNESCO, 2013. <http://www.broadbandcommission.org/work/working-groups/gender.aspx>.
Burkitt, Ian.2008. Subjectivity, Self and Everyday Life in Contemporary Capitalism. Subjectivity23: 236-245.
Butler, Judith.1993. Bodies That Matter. On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”.New York: Routledge.
Butler, Judith.1998. Actos Performativos y Constitución del Género: un Ensayo Sobre Fenomenología y Teoría Feminista. Debate Feminista18: 296-314.
Califa, Pat.1994. Public Sex. Pittsburgh: Cleiss Press.
Callon, Michel.1986. Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? ed. JohnLaw. London: Routledge, 196-223.
Camacho, Kemly.2005. La Brecha Digital. In Palabras en juego: enfoques multiculturales sobre las sociedades de la información, coords. AlainAmbrosi, ValériePeugeot and DanielPimienta. Caen: C & F Éditions. <http://vecam.org/article550.html>.
Castaño, Cecilia (ed.). 2008 La segunda brecha digital. Madrid: Cátedra.
Castaño, Cecilia, JuanMartín and SusanaVázquez. 2008. La E-inclusión y el bienestar social: una perspectiva de género. Economía Industrial367: 139-152.
Castells, Manuel.2002. La era de la información. Vol. I: la sociedad red. Mexico: Siglo XXI Editores.
Castells, Manuel.2010. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Chancer, Lynn S.1998. Reconcilable Differences: Confronting Beauty, Pornography and the Future of Feminism.Berkeley: University of California Press.
Clough, Patricia.2008. The Affective Turn: Political Economy, Biomedia and Bodies. Theory Culture Society 25 n° 1: 1-22.
Cockburn, Cynthia.1983. Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change.London: Pluto Press.
Crabtree, James.2001. The Digital Divide Is Rubbish. New Statesman <http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-73064565.html>.
Espai en Blanc. 2008. El malestar social en una sociedad terapéutica. Espai en Blanc3/4. <http://www.espaienblanc.net/El-malestar-social-en-una-sociedad.html>.
Faulkner, Wendy and MereteLie. 2007. Gender in the Information Society: Strategies of Inclusion. Gender, Technology and Development11, n° 2: 157-177.
Furstenau, Marc and AdrianMackenzie. 2009. The Promise of ‘Makeability’: Digital Editing Software and the Structuring of Everyday Cinematic Life. Visual Communication 8 n° 1: 5-22.
Giddens, Anthony.1999. Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives. London: Profile.
Gill, Rosalind.2009. Beyond the ‘Sexualization of Culture’ Thesis: An Intersectional Analysis of ‘Sixpacks,’ ‘Midriffs’ and ‘Hot Lesbians’ in Advertising. Sexualities12, n° 2: 137-160.
Gorz, André. 2003. L’immatériel: Connaissance, Valeur et Capital. Paris: Galilée.
Grint, Keith and RosalindGill. 1995. The Gender–Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research. London: Taylor & Francis.
Gunkel, David.2001. Hacking Cyberspace. Boulder: Westview Press.
Gunkel, David.2003. Second Thoughts: Toward a Critique of the Digital Divide. New Media & Society5, n° 4: 499-522.
Haraway, Donna.1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
Hardt, Michael.1999. Affective Labour. Boundary 2 26, n° 2: 89-100.
Henwood, Flis.2000. From the Woman Question in Technology to the Technology Question in Feminism. Rethinking Gender Equality in IT Education. European Journal of Women’s Studies7: 209-227.
Huyer, Sophia.2013. Gender Equality in the Knowledge Society: Will it Deliver?Cosmopolis0, n° 1. <http://www.cosmopolis-rev.org/index.php/cosmo/article/view/128>.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). 2009. Encuesta sobre equipamiento y uso de tecnologías de información y comunicación en los hogares, año 2009. <http://www.ine.es/prensa/np570.pdf>.
Juhasz, Alexandra.1999. It’s About Autonomy, Stupid: Sexuality in Feminist Video. Sexualities2, n° 3: 333-341.
Lago, Silvia.2008. Internet y cultura digital: la intervención política y militante. Nómadas28: 102-111.
Landström, Catharina.2007. Queering Feminist Technology Studies. Feminist Theory8, n° 1: 7-26.
Larner, Wendy and DavidCraig. 2005. After Neoliberalism? Community Activism and Local Partnerships in Aotearoa New Zealand. Antipode37, n° 3: 402-424.
Lasén, Amparo.2009. Tecnologías afectivas: de cómo los teléfonos móviles participan en la constitución de subjetividades e identidades. In Tecnología, cultura experta e identidad en la sociedad del conocimiento, eds. GabrielGatti, Iñaki Martínezde Albéniz and BenjamínTejerina. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco, 215-248.
Latour, Bruno.1991. Technology is Society Made Durable. In A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination, ed. JohnLaw. London: Routledge, 103-131.
Lazzarato, Maurizio.2009. Expérimentations politiques. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam.
Lessig, Lawrence.1999. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace.New York: Basic Books.
Lessig, Lawrence.2004. Cultura libre. Digital Edition. <http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/blogs/gems/ion/Culturalibre.pdf>.
Lohan, María.2000. Constructive Tensions in Feminist Technology Studies. Social Studies of Science30, n° 6: 895-916.
McNair, Brian.1996. Mediated Sex: Pornography and Postmodern Culture. London: Edward Arnold.
McNair, Brian.2002. Striptease Culture: Sex, Media and the Democratization of Desire. London: Routledge.
Montenegro, Marisela and JoanPujol. 2010. Nuevas tecnologías y agenciamiento juvenil: aproximación desde el ciberfeminismo. Revista de Estudios de Juventud89: 221-234.
Moore, Dinty.1995. The Emperor’s Virtual Clothes: The Naked Truth about Internet Culture. Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books.
Nead, Lynda.1992. The Female Nude. Art, Obscenity and Sexuality. London: Routledge.
Núñez, Sonia and AntonioGarcía. 2009. New Technologies and New Spaces for Relation Spanish Feminist Praxis Online. European Journal of Women’s Studies 16 n° 3: 249-263.
Papacharissi, Zizi.2009. The Virtual Geographies of Social Networks: A Comparative Analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and AsmallWorld. New Media & Society11 n° 1/2: 199-220.
Paul, Pamela.2005. Pornified: How Pornography is Transforming Our Lives, Our Relationships and Our Families. New York: Times Books.
Penley, Constance and RossAndrew. 1991. Technoculture.Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Preciado, Beatriz.2001. Manifiesto contra-sexual. Madrid: Opera Prima.
Rasmussen, Claire and MichaelBrown. 2002. Radical Democratic Citizenship: Amidst Political Theory and Geography. In Handbook of Citizen Studies, eds. IsinEngin and BryanTurner. London: Sage, 175-188.
Roggero, Gigi.2007. La autonomía del conocimiento vivo en la Universidad-Metrópolis. European Institute for progressive cultural policies. <http://eipcp.net/transversal/0707/roggero/es>.
Rommes, Eels, Ellenvan Oost and NellyOudshoorn. 1999. Gender in the Design of the Digital City of Amsterdam. Information, Communication & Society2, n° 4: 476-495.
Rose, Nikolas.1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Royal, Cindy.2008. Framing the Internet: A Comparison of Gendered Spaces. Social Science Computer Review 26 n° 2: 152-169.
Rubin, Gayle.1984. Thinking Sex. In Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality, Comp. CaroleVance. London: Routledge, 267-293.
Sassen, Saskia.2002. Towards a Sociology of Information Technology. Current Sociology50, n° 3: 365-388.
Scolari, Carlos Alberto.2009. Mapping Conversations about New Media: The Theoretical Field of Digital Communication. New Media & Society11, n° 6: 943-964.
Skinner, Harvey, SherryBiscope and BlakePoland. 2003. Quality of Internet Access: Barrier Behind Internet Use Statistics. Social Science Medicine57, n° 5: 875-880.
Stallman, Richard.2010. Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman. Boston: Free Software Foundation.
Suarez-Villa, Luis. 2009. Technocapitalism: A Critical Perspective on Technological Innovation and Corporatism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Suarez-Villa, Luis. 2012. Globalization and Technocapitalism: The Political Economy of Corporate Power and Technological Domination. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Thierer, Adam.2000. How Free Computers Are Filling the Digital Divide. The Heritage Foundation. <http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2000/04/how-free-computers-are-filling-the-digital-divide>.
Thomas, Douglas.2005. Hacking the Body: Code, Performance and Corporeality. New Media Society7, n° 5: 647-662.
United Nations (UN). 2010. The Millennium Development Goals. United Nations. <http://www.un.org/en/mdg/summit2010/documents.shtml>.
Van Dijk, Jan.1991. The Network Society. London: Sage.
Virno, Paulo.2003. Virtuosismo y revolución. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
Wajcman, Judy.1991. Feminism Confronts Technology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wajcman, Judy.2000. Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies: What State is the Art?Social Studies of Science30, n° 3: 447-464.
Wajcman, Judy.2004. Technofeminism.Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wajcman, Judy.2007. From Women and Technology to Gendered Technoscience. Information, Communication Society10, n° 3: 287-298.
Watkins, S. Craig and Rana Emerson. 2000. Feminist Media Criticism and Feminist Media Practices. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 571: 151-166.
WISAT. 2013. National Assessments on Gender Equality in the Knowledge Society. Gender in Science, Technology and Innovation.Ontario. The Elservier Foundation. <http://wisat.org/programs/national-assessments-on-gender-sti/>.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.