Tecnologia e feminismo: um estranho casal
No. 51 (2015-01-01)Autor(es)
-
Joan Pujol
-
Marisela Montenegro
Resumo
A “brecha digital de gênero” constitui um produtivo programa de pesquisa que compara as diferenças entre mulheres e homens no acesso às Tecnologias da Informação e Comunicação. Contudo, as perspectivas socioconstrutivistas feministas defendem a necessidade de prestar atenção não somente ao “acesso”, mas também ao “desenho” e consideram as relações sociais como elementos codificados no interior dos artefatos tecnológicos. Sob essa perspectiva, o gênero constitui uma parte integral da produção tecnológica. Este trabalho explora a constituição conjunta de gênero e tecnologia a partir de uma experiência de pesquisa-ação específica. Argumenta-se que a ressignificação dos códigos de gênero e tecnológicos se desloca por meio da: a) abertura dos códigos de gênero e tecnológicos; b) produção de novos imaginários culturais que questionam as representações hegemônicas de gênero; e c) produção de novas subjetividades mediante a reorganização das práticas sociotécnicas para o desenvolvimento de atos performativos que transformam as relações patriarcais.
Referências
Arns, Inke.2005. El código como acto de habla performativo. Artnodes. Revista de Arte, Ciencia y Tecnologia. <http://www.uoc.edu/artnodes/espai/esp/art/arns0505.pdf>.
Bauman, Zygmunt.2011. Culture in a Liquid Modern World. Cambridge – Malden: Polity Press – Blackwell.
Beck, Ulrich.2000. The Brave New World of Work. Cambridge – Malden: Polity Press.
Beck, Ulrich.2004. Cosmopolitical Realism: On the Distinction between Cosmopolitanism in Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Global Networks4, n° 2: 131-156.
Bimber, Bruce.2000. Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet. Social Science Quarterly81, n° 3: 868-876.
Blair, Kristine and PamelaTakayoshi (eds.). 1999. Feminist Cyberscapes: Mapping Gendered Academic Spaces (New Directions in Computers and Composition Studies). Stamford: Ablex Publishing Corp.
Blissett, Luther and SonjaBrünzels. 2000. Manual de Guerrilla de la Comunicación.Barcelona: Editorial Virus.
Brady, Mick.2000. The Digital Divide Myth. Commerce Times. <http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/3953.html>.
Broadband Commission Working Group (BCWG). 2013. Doubling Digital Opportunities – Enhancing the Inclusion of Women & Girls in the Information Society.ITU and UNESCO, 2013. <http://www.broadbandcommission.org/work/working-groups/gender.aspx>.
Burkitt, Ian.2008. Subjectivity, Self and Everyday Life in Contemporary Capitalism. Subjectivity23: 236-245.
Butler, Judith.1993. Bodies That Matter. On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”.New York: Routledge.
Butler, Judith.1998. Actos Performativos y Constitución del Género: un Ensayo Sobre Fenomenología y Teoría Feminista. Debate Feminista18: 296-314.
Califa, Pat.1994. Public Sex. Pittsburgh: Cleiss Press.
Callon, Michel.1986. Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? ed. JohnLaw. London: Routledge, 196-223.
Camacho, Kemly.2005. La Brecha Digital. In Palabras en juego: enfoques multiculturales sobre las sociedades de la información, coords. AlainAmbrosi, ValériePeugeot and DanielPimienta. Caen: C & F Éditions. <http://vecam.org/article550.html>.
Castaño, Cecilia (ed.). 2008 La segunda brecha digital. Madrid: Cátedra.
Castaño, Cecilia, JuanMartín and SusanaVázquez. 2008. La E-inclusión y el bienestar social: una perspectiva de género. Economía Industrial367: 139-152.
Castells, Manuel.2002. La era de la información. Vol. I: la sociedad red. Mexico: Siglo XXI Editores.
Castells, Manuel.2010. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Chancer, Lynn S.1998. Reconcilable Differences: Confronting Beauty, Pornography and the Future of Feminism.Berkeley: University of California Press.
Clough, Patricia.2008. The Affective Turn: Political Economy, Biomedia and Bodies. Theory Culture Society 25 n° 1: 1-22.
Cockburn, Cynthia.1983. Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change.London: Pluto Press.
Crabtree, James.2001. The Digital Divide Is Rubbish. New Statesman <http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-73064565.html>.
Espai en Blanc. 2008. El malestar social en una sociedad terapéutica. Espai en Blanc3/4. <http://www.espaienblanc.net/El-malestar-social-en-una-sociedad.html>.
Faulkner, Wendy and MereteLie. 2007. Gender in the Information Society: Strategies of Inclusion. Gender, Technology and Development11, n° 2: 157-177.
Furstenau, Marc and AdrianMackenzie. 2009. The Promise of ‘Makeability’: Digital Editing Software and the Structuring of Everyday Cinematic Life. Visual Communication 8 n° 1: 5-22.
Giddens, Anthony.1999. Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives. London: Profile.
Gill, Rosalind.2009. Beyond the ‘Sexualization of Culture’ Thesis: An Intersectional Analysis of ‘Sixpacks,’ ‘Midriffs’ and ‘Hot Lesbians’ in Advertising. Sexualities12, n° 2: 137-160.
Gorz, André. 2003. L’immatériel: Connaissance, Valeur et Capital. Paris: Galilée.
Grint, Keith and RosalindGill. 1995. The Gender–Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research. London: Taylor & Francis.
Gunkel, David.2001. Hacking Cyberspace. Boulder: Westview Press.
Gunkel, David.2003. Second Thoughts: Toward a Critique of the Digital Divide. New Media & Society5, n° 4: 499-522.
Haraway, Donna.1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
Hardt, Michael.1999. Affective Labour. Boundary 2 26, n° 2: 89-100.
Henwood, Flis.2000. From the Woman Question in Technology to the Technology Question in Feminism. Rethinking Gender Equality in IT Education. European Journal of Women’s Studies7: 209-227.
Huyer, Sophia.2013. Gender Equality in the Knowledge Society: Will it Deliver?Cosmopolis0, n° 1. <http://www.cosmopolis-rev.org/index.php/cosmo/article/view/128>.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). 2009. Encuesta sobre equipamiento y uso de tecnologías de información y comunicación en los hogares, año 2009. <http://www.ine.es/prensa/np570.pdf>.
Juhasz, Alexandra.1999. It’s About Autonomy, Stupid: Sexuality in Feminist Video. Sexualities2, n° 3: 333-341.
Lago, Silvia.2008. Internet y cultura digital: la intervención política y militante. Nómadas28: 102-111.
Landström, Catharina.2007. Queering Feminist Technology Studies. Feminist Theory8, n° 1: 7-26.
Larner, Wendy and DavidCraig. 2005. After Neoliberalism? Community Activism and Local Partnerships in Aotearoa New Zealand. Antipode37, n° 3: 402-424.
Lasén, Amparo.2009. Tecnologías afectivas: de cómo los teléfonos móviles participan en la constitución de subjetividades e identidades. In Tecnología, cultura experta e identidad en la sociedad del conocimiento, eds. GabrielGatti, Iñaki Martínezde Albéniz and BenjamínTejerina. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco, 215-248.
Latour, Bruno.1991. Technology is Society Made Durable. In A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination, ed. JohnLaw. London: Routledge, 103-131.
Lazzarato, Maurizio.2009. Expérimentations politiques. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam.
Lessig, Lawrence.1999. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace.New York: Basic Books.
Lessig, Lawrence.2004. Cultura libre. Digital Edition. <http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/blogs/gems/ion/Culturalibre.pdf>.
Lohan, María.2000. Constructive Tensions in Feminist Technology Studies. Social Studies of Science30, n° 6: 895-916.
McNair, Brian.1996. Mediated Sex: Pornography and Postmodern Culture. London: Edward Arnold.
McNair, Brian.2002. Striptease Culture: Sex, Media and the Democratization of Desire. London: Routledge.
Montenegro, Marisela and JoanPujol. 2010. Nuevas tecnologías y agenciamiento juvenil: aproximación desde el ciberfeminismo. Revista de Estudios de Juventud89: 221-234.
Moore, Dinty.1995. The Emperor’s Virtual Clothes: The Naked Truth about Internet Culture. Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books.
Nead, Lynda.1992. The Female Nude. Art, Obscenity and Sexuality. London: Routledge.
Núñez, Sonia and AntonioGarcía. 2009. New Technologies and New Spaces for Relation Spanish Feminist Praxis Online. European Journal of Women’s Studies 16 n° 3: 249-263.
Papacharissi, Zizi.2009. The Virtual Geographies of Social Networks: A Comparative Analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and AsmallWorld. New Media & Society11 n° 1/2: 199-220.
Paul, Pamela.2005. Pornified: How Pornography is Transforming Our Lives, Our Relationships and Our Families. New York: Times Books.
Penley, Constance and RossAndrew. 1991. Technoculture.Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Preciado, Beatriz.2001. Manifiesto contra-sexual. Madrid: Opera Prima.
Rasmussen, Claire and MichaelBrown. 2002. Radical Democratic Citizenship: Amidst Political Theory and Geography. In Handbook of Citizen Studies, eds. IsinEngin and BryanTurner. London: Sage, 175-188.
Roggero, Gigi.2007. La autonomía del conocimiento vivo en la Universidad-Metrópolis. European Institute for progressive cultural policies. <http://eipcp.net/transversal/0707/roggero/es>.
Rommes, Eels, Ellenvan Oost and NellyOudshoorn. 1999. Gender in the Design of the Digital City of Amsterdam. Information, Communication & Society2, n° 4: 476-495.
Rose, Nikolas.1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Royal, Cindy.2008. Framing the Internet: A Comparison of Gendered Spaces. Social Science Computer Review 26 n° 2: 152-169.
Rubin, Gayle.1984. Thinking Sex. In Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality, Comp. CaroleVance. London: Routledge, 267-293.
Sassen, Saskia.2002. Towards a Sociology of Information Technology. Current Sociology50, n° 3: 365-388.
Scolari, Carlos Alberto.2009. Mapping Conversations about New Media: The Theoretical Field of Digital Communication. New Media & Society11, n° 6: 943-964.
Skinner, Harvey, SherryBiscope and BlakePoland. 2003. Quality of Internet Access: Barrier Behind Internet Use Statistics. Social Science Medicine57, n° 5: 875-880.
Stallman, Richard.2010. Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman. Boston: Free Software Foundation.
Suarez-Villa, Luis. 2009. Technocapitalism: A Critical Perspective on Technological Innovation and Corporatism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Suarez-Villa, Luis. 2012. Globalization and Technocapitalism: The Political Economy of Corporate Power and Technological Domination. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Thierer, Adam.2000. How Free Computers Are Filling the Digital Divide. The Heritage Foundation. <http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2000/04/how-free-computers-are-filling-the-digital-divide>.
Thomas, Douglas.2005. Hacking the Body: Code, Performance and Corporeality. New Media Society7, n° 5: 647-662.
United Nations (UN). 2010. The Millennium Development Goals. United Nations. <http://www.un.org/en/mdg/summit2010/documents.shtml>.
Van Dijk, Jan.1991. The Network Society. London: Sage.
Virno, Paulo.2003. Virtuosismo y revolución. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
Wajcman, Judy.1991. Feminism Confronts Technology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wajcman, Judy.2000. Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies: What State is the Art?Social Studies of Science30, n° 3: 447-464.
Wajcman, Judy.2004. Technofeminism.Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wajcman, Judy.2007. From Women and Technology to Gendered Technoscience. Information, Communication Society10, n° 3: 287-298.
Watkins, S. Craig and Rana Emerson. 2000. Feminist Media Criticism and Feminist Media Practices. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 571: 151-166.
WISAT. 2013. National Assessments on Gender Equality in the Knowledge Society. Gender in Science, Technology and Innovation.Ontario. The Elservier Foundation. <http://wisat.org/programs/national-assessments-on-gender-sti/>.
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.